Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 23 February 2017 01:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B8E129D9F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:51:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZvQyNbgh5_V for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x22c.google.com (mail-vk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49EEB129DA6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:51:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id t8so12452850vke.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:51:11 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=JShC4nDxORjZTUrFDVOSSLFRKjGesq5on501tTKEzeE=; b=NENXnbF2HHd0P4O06snYIb3Bwgmr8a2jMqbznnDbcou81eT7d3vforo9D2cBVEtTM1 6FITRbih1uF0p5DJykK75ft4LwnlDsn/EGITtLt5/3drICHueq46Zx1SuJX5f5qWzGit qc42q7HCUYzHIH6wrNYdyDTSslZV2rA90obDij61ztwIueO1V9m6SGdYTcX8KMv70nQG uw9qSwfJcEJZxm3tlUV3lw1JcYfTlEbRMd9Hz0Csofh07WILrxuWbzl49r71z/jPDaKS ItvBMkIyiwDEBISFs1x390eqDi7fsQL94BrtJ4TI6vQHj8BQ88grryilOC0ByiJp43cm rrEA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=JShC4nDxORjZTUrFDVOSSLFRKjGesq5on501tTKEzeE=; b=KpkawTdYiI8ekfOwMKKBbp0YM0j50H058XajdXSG5TiwBNforAYYBHuBZXZkJZ2A0f c4O+ZC3OmqpLFH9LxlN2QRW6M5vxpLCSXzxw5JHSZlS9R/0LQki1px15CQcSe3wJKG28 pH+W5nboe/WeJjAwQiLP6QcjTBiXasXuyhynb1fpRnYyce78drdjOMe9aXwlz4utSVrB qzGwTQbRLHh2QAGltkDh1sHcwtptiLpeqx78uXEp3Wi/SPGAx76xrlApjB0dLLc5pDrI YnUscGq0IPM8fYrBluKRtdGr+ez+h53S4Vwa/P7znHcxqXqC4MhrYPgPeV+b1yugIcht MG7Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lqlVHoaP0OmGQxWThm2W2VtyzHopfEI0eOSwB324TWe6U3DvGG6M1XawPqAd1m+cAM59k7Gj+gRryqn1dW
X-Received: by 10.31.142.68 with SMTP id q65mr17611397vkd.83.1487814670177; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:51:10 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:50:49 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m2efypvi6o.wl-randy@psg.com>
References: <20170221101339.GC84656@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr33oQb=gMGaEM++hLgmMtxMdihiDrUihEsjs63vy8qRbA@mail.gmail.com> <54c81141-e4f5-4436-9479-9c02be6c09bb@Spark> <CAKD1Yr28iQHt0iuLvR3ndrT3Hfct=4k9dxjJeu3MAjDjOogEvA@mail.gmail.com> <CAL9jLaZgTp++PJ9KGHEWuPoVm6t3b8QfVDCEhz5h4fv-0fuUAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr3SbR=xt3RPu7+q1o14wKuUuwUc6oG+BgZtEK1O+m5sWw@mail.gmail.com> <4936e96b-fc82-4de0-9188-ced9547deb2f@Spark> <CAKD1Yr3K+SJb_4ksZ96yNypVKJE-fXopuVaXNhhKp1gkh1=QEg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222144147.GC89584@hanna.meerval.net> <CAKD1Yr2n=ogFo7LJYgjcraoFxioQQzmo8HYxzNRJ10VA8xMVOg@mail.gmail.com> <20170222153129.GE89584@hanna.meerval.net> <m2poiaug54.wl-randy@psg.com> <CAKD1Yr04AKpvp81KdSb9zoMfr0ZdNLq8a+Wgk-3KqSYfP=Qn7g@mail.gmail.com> <m2efypvi6o.wl-randy@psg.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 10:50:49 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr0bUTT+NSjO=9GFeDU1UnsFjxneS5kqQw2U5UgQp7RnSg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143703ae8b0d7054928d86d
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/9zSFBsgHfKL0uq6vzeF6lGirF0w>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 01:51:18 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>; wrote:

> > Host developers could just as well claim "this is just network ops
> telling
> > us what we should do do and denying what we actually do and intend to
> keep
> > on doing".
>
> how is that working out for dual-stack and dhcp android users?
>

What do you mean? Are you saying that host developers don't always and
automatically do what network operators want them to do? If that's
motivated by the fact that they are acting in their users' interests, it
seems to me that they are justified in doing so, and in fact, would be
remiss not to.

> With the difference that the standards clearly specify what the current
> > state of affairs is.
>
> and now we need to make the wannabe document match what the state of
> affairs is in networking.
>

That doesn't mean "we've been violating the standards, so now the standards
have to change to match what we've been doing, even if other parties are
depending on the standards", does it? :-)