Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing

Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org> Fri, 07 May 2021 12:48 UTC

Return-Path: <nick@foobar.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58A6B3A1FE8; Fri, 7 May 2021 05:48:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PkfPt4DaXJuN; Fri, 7 May 2021 05:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.netability.ie (mail.netability.ie [IPv6:2a03:8900:0:100::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEE13A1FE3; Fri, 7 May 2021 05:48:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Envelope-To: 6man@ietf.org
Received: from crumpet.local (admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.netability.ie (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPSA id 147CmjDJ029136 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 May 2021 13:48:46 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from nick@foobar.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cheesecake.ibn.ie: Host admin.ibn.ie [46.182.8.8] claimed to be crumpet.local
Subject: Re: FW: Next steps discussing Routing Challenges of Semantic Addressing
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Cc: 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <4f22f9591c0a48d1a351f52318cd3319@boeing.com> <CAOj+MMHxh5UmUsPOmun+XGPcBK0=AGLzSpx7Nemni1WzPnta9w@mail.gmail.com> <0e347fa8-0071-ab1f-9872-5611a2128fcb@foobar.org> <c1250d72-2133-95a2-c74b-8649d5aec0f3@gmail.com> <c50ade33-c754-da95-bd71-2fa2d106c9ef@foobar.org> <CAOj+MMHaGrR4Q-QHv5bvEcbSvhKB646tz338ntFgWZpVBr3E7Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>
Message-ID: <1bea3813-62fb-c44c-8303-d9d80bae8d74@foobar.org>
Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 13:48:44 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.16; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 PostboxApp/7.0.48
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MMHaGrR4Q-QHv5bvEcbSvhKB646tz338ntFgWZpVBr3E7Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/A2_LK0M3ha9qtYsGLmiebDGYlWo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 12:48:52 -0000

Robert Raszuk wrote on 07/05/2021 13:00:
> Please observe that those ideas have been shipping for years and are 
> deployed in SP networks.

the proposals presented in terastream were, iirc, deployed to some 
degree in some networks but didn't end up with the wider rollout that 
was originally anticipated.  Some of the people involved with terastream 
are on v6ops/6man, so they may (or may not) want to provide more 
information.

Nick