RE: "Deprecate"

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Fri, 02 August 2013 17:35 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E17611E80EE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:35:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CUoD9ACSS9Ng for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:35:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (shell4.bayarea.net [209.128.82.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E48111E80E8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Aug 2013 10:35:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 15777 invoked from network); 2 Aug 2013 10:35:08 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (209.128.82.1) by shell4.bayarea.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 2 Aug 2013 10:35:08 -0700
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 10:35:07 -0700
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
X-X-Sender: heard@shell4.bayarea.net
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: "Deprecate"
In-Reply-To: <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180DD972@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1308021031090.10327@shell4.bayarea.net>
References: <FAD482FE-4583-472A-8B57-E789A942686E@gmail.com> <1DF7BDE3-1490-41FE-A959-EC8EC54B0A5F@tzi.org> <8B84E185-36AC-4F22-A88E-5A2F1200AE8B@gmail.com> <51DC77B1.9020206@gmail.com> <DEDA9E45-2839-4D7C-9D86-04360DDE9C1D@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180DCA04@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <F47D3B2D-A883-4F24-9263-95F85F59E20A@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180DD8F5@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180DD972@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 17:35:23 -0000

Thanks for adding transport mode ... it's essential for addressing 
the issues under discussion on this thread.

//cmh

On Fri, 2 Aug 2013, Templin, Fred L wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Up to now, the SEAL spec has focused on "tunnel mode", and had the
> singular statement:
> 
>   "(A transport-mode of operation is also possible, but out of scope
>    for this document.)"
> 
> in the introduction. (Indeed, the first edition of SEAL (RFC5320)
> did specify a transport mode of operation, but that document will
> be obsolete by the second edition.) So, in light of these discussions
> I decided that now might be a good time to bring transport mode back
> into scope and as such have added the following new section to the
> document. Please send comments and suggestions. I will post a new
> draft version by the end of the day that will include both tunnel
> and transport modes.
> 
> Thanks - Fred
> fred.l.templin@boeing.com
> 
> 6.  SEAL Transport Mode Specification
> 
>    SEAL is also used for transport-mode operation.  Transport mode
>    refers to a SEAL encapsulation in which a layer-4 header appears
>    immediately following the SEAL header.  The type of layer-4 header is
>    indicated in the "NEXTHDR" field the same as for tunnel mode.  The
>    SEAL header is identical to the version used for tunnel mode, except
>    that the "LINK_ID" and "LEVEL" fields are omitted, and the transport
>    layer port numbers are included in each non-initial segment (see:
>    Figure 6).
> 
>        0                   1                   2                   3
>        0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |    NEXTHDR    |VER|C|P|I|V|R|M|     Offset    |    Reserved   |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       | Source Port (when Offset!=0)  |   Dest Port (when Offset!=0)  |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |                      Identification (optional)                |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+
>       |                  Integrity Check Vector (optional)            |
>       +-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+-+   ...
> 
>                        Figure 6: SEAL Header Format
> 
>    The "Source Port" and "Dest Port" are taken from the corresponding
>    fields in the transport layer next header that appears immediately
>    following the SEAL header in the initial segment.  For example, for
>    UDP [RFC0768] the transport layer source/dest ports are 16 bits in
>    length and are copied from the transport layer header.  All
>    segmentation is exactly as specified in SEAL tunnel mode, and the
>    SEAL Control Message Protocol (SCMP) operates the same as for tunnel
>    mode.  For example, the source node can probe the path MTU to the
>    destination by setting the P bit in a probe packet and waiting for an
>    acknowledgement from the destination.
> 
>    SEAL transport mode is useful for transport layer protocols that have
>    no way to segment the large packets they send.  It is a universal
>    format that can be applied to any such transport.
>