Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 24 November 2020 17:00 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C78623A1214; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:00:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.155
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.155 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD=1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=1.2, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.972, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TXNcnU1JtOWf; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 355B73A120E; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 09:00:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0AOH0dWq021016; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:39 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id EB2B2209518; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D9F2094FB; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:38 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [10.11.244.24] ([10.11.244.24]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id 0AOH0cTc014762; Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:38 +0100
Subject: Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator nor handset supports PD?
To: otroan@employees.org, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo=40google.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, IPv6 Operations <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>, "draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org" <draft-mishra-6man-variable-slaac@ietf.org>
References: <CABNhwV2-dH81CY4wSisV8BU-7H9m5a1xYMqTMecRxhNqZe=ApQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1xV179LZ7Kxtk5mGruJcJ+BpGb2heBBy4ORtRU7bfvqw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriWqnmL0qo0Hm=b+GbzcdCuXz6PM5aq8owE7-=ty5pDFsw@mail.gmail.com> <1DB65027-BEF2-4C0A-ACF4-C979DA7444C2@employees.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <c825a649-42e9-2bb7-fef9-8ab637f9a464@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 18:00:38 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <1DB65027-BEF2-4C0A-ACF4-C979DA7444C2@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/AGoPG5o14PiSJCQoqaMuFgzqM-A>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Nov 2020 17:00:51 -0000
Le 24/11/2020 à 13:17, otroan@employees.org a écrit : [...] > I come to realise something and I want to hear if others agree. Since publication I wondered whether P2P Ethernet is an L2TP 'in disguise'? I mean, If I understand correctly, L2TP is used in residential networks much how the P2P Ethernet seems to be assumed to work on a cellular link: a ptp link whose interfaces are highly like Ethernet. > The 3GPP model is in may ways very similar to the model I described in P2P Ethernet. > It's not traditional address assignment happening on that link. The upstream router does not have a connected route > and glean adjacency (address resolution required) towards the host. > > When a RA with a /64 PIO is sent and the mobile terminal does tethering, it's much more like prefix delegation of that /64. > > In a traditional RA+PIO with L=1, the router states: > This prefix is directly connected between us and requires address resolution. > If A=1 && plen == 64 you can generate an address from this prefix. > > In the P2P Ethernet/3GPP case it says: > This prefix is not used on the link between us. > The prefix is dedicated to you, and I promise to install a route like: > ipv6 route <prefix> p2p-interface | interface, NH pointing at you. > You can if you like configure an address on the interface on the upstream link, > as the router will forward traffic to anything in that prefix blindly. > (you aren't strictly doing SLAAC at that point though.) > > In the latter case the prefix-length can be <1-128>. > > Now, if someone else could more succinctly express that difference... I cant express it more succinctly. The difference between 'assigning a prefix to a link' and 'allocating a prefix to a Host' depends on the nexthop presence and the kind of iface in the routing table entry. In the simplest linuces, three alternate forms of entries in the routing table are possible: (1) nexthop '*' | kind of iface 'Ethernet' (2) nexthop '*' | kind of iface 'ptp' (3) nexthop IP-of-Host | kind of iface 'Ethernet' or 'ptp' (assume a prefix/plen in each entry) In the first form, a Gateway 'assigns' that prefix on that link. The Host can form an address within that prefix, but packets whose dst is some address within that prefix might not reach that Host, because other Host might have it, and because ND would kick in and resolve to that other Host's IP address; ND is used because there is no nexthop. This is the typical Ethernet. This is called 'connected' route, I think, on Cisco. In the second form, a Gateway 'assigns' the prefix to that link, and also 'delegates' the prefix to the Host. Packets whose dst is any address prefixed by that prefix will be transmitted to that Host, because ND is not used on ptp links, because even if there is no nexthop, the 'ptp' is exceptional; 'ptp' means no ND because there are always two neighbors that know each other very well. In the third form, a Gateway 'delegates' the prefix to the Host but does not 'assign' it on the link. The Host cant form an address out of that prefix on the receiving interface. That prefix is not assigned to that link. But packets addressed to any address prefixed by that prefix are indeed forwarded to the Host, because ND is not used here because there is a next-hop. In summary: Assign to link Delegate to Host (1) x (2) x x (3) x Alex > > Best regards, > Ole >
- How do you solve 3GPP issue if neither operator n… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: [EXTERNAL] How do you solve 3GPP issue if nei… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Erik Kline
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP… Jared Mauch
- Re: p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve … Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve … Jared Mauch
- Re: p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve … otroan
- Re: p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve … Eric Vyncke (evyncke)
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… David Allan I
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Philip Homburg
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Ole Troan
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… tom petch
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Michael Richardson
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Michael Richardson
- Re: p2p interfaces (Re: [v6ops] How do you solve … Jen Linkova
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Ole Troan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Mark Smith
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Lorenzo Colitti
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Nick Hilliard
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Michael Richardson
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… otroan
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Philip Homburg
- RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP … Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Philip Homburg
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [v6ops] How do you solve 3GPP issue if neithe… Alexandre Petrescu