Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt>

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Fri, 07 September 2012 02:12 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE5421F841D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rI4AXM3GDysy for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F84921F841B for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Sep 2012 19:12:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (50-0-150-57.dsl.static.sonic.net [50.0.150.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id q872CJGr037172 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 7 Sep 2012 02:12:20 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <50495803.9000306@bogus.com>
Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2012 19:12:19 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120821 Thunderbird/15.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN WG Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt>
References: <72907536-3B88-4E29-87EA-562A8DAD3A85@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <72907536-3B88-4E29-87EA-562A8DAD3A85@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Fri, 07 Sep 2012 02:12:20 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org Mailing List" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 02:12:22 -0000

I think this is an important change, and I think our work on the problem 
side of the things underscores that.

As a contributor I am in favor of advancing this document.

That said I'd also like to hear from implementers that this is a 
reasonable fix with few if any negative consequences (something I 
believe to be the case).

joel

On 9/4/12 10:28 AM, Bob Hinden wrote:
> All,
>
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group on advancing:
>
> 	Title           : Neighbor Unreachability Detection is too impatient
> 	Author(s)       : Erik Nordmark
>                            Igor Gashinsky
> 	Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02.txt
> 	Pages           : 8
> 	Date            : 2012-07-31
>
>          http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-impatient-nud-02
>
> as Proposed Standard.  Substantive comments and statements of support for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list.  Editorial suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on September 18, 2012.
>
> Regards,
> Ole Troan & Bob Hinden
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>