IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call on adopting:<draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 12 May 2012 06:34 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB79521F8625 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.584
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.584 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.107, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_ILLEGAL_IP=1.908, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wns2tLL75z1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com (mail-wi0-f178.google.com [209.85.212.178]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC189E8005 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by wibhn6 with SMTP id hn6so755408wib.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=USBe6vLHFqCdS/Ar2Wq+GB2Do0DYqomfes/290I2JwY=; b=OYIjDH9vIFleW15cE3EsqiUrXTH6imBxDaSLx87K9xe7m2qsMyc1a9MstEQFCasUgG ufxVrJEEzr/zBTYJ3K4NMBV5l7DJ09f4JOtEQ/43sOvUvi6DWHSNzdbR77w73mgrobDZ nFsdXkXqbdcj9Wrxoc2Ie13tvHD6mSvwCcqV9Augdp27Enlm55hwWUWGoN3jUoEF45aj 6aruZhBl3lkpGVV1Im3nOEQbsi1Nog3a65fgo5wesGMZ5NMZYNLIkJT6yN47v2WoVaRb 9C16TjLf3hXKj1RBsI9cT4rvr4vtO9opha7cCnfoHh9wgZ8T2fqnetnUdfH3D6GiLrUo E7Mg==
Received: by 10.216.216.1 with SMTP id f1mr569513wep.24.1336804453454; Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.65] (host-2-102-216-118.as13285.net. [2.102.216.118]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id fl2sm25964557wib.2.2012.05.11.23.34.11 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 23:34:12 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4FAE045C.7060007@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 07:34:04 +0100
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting:<draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com> <60CF6942-0D99-422A-8BEB-87A98B7F233D@employees.org> <4FAB02D5.9090300@gont.com.ar> <C2475E14-3A32-4A2F-839B-A61497E43B3C@gmail.com> <m2likzph8e.wl%randy@psg.com> <3646A828-DD8F-4A2C-B8F3-B9DE2FB4771D@gmail.com> <m2sjf6mq28.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2sjf6mq28.wl%randy@psg.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 May 2012 06:34:15 -0000

On 2012-05-11 21:16, Randy Bush wrote:
>>> i beg to differ.  i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly
>>> as fernando states.  if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my*
>>> marbles and go home.
>> Thanks for saying it so clearly.  I choose to not do that as do many
>> others.  I allow my contributions to be used by others in the IETF
>> process.
> 
> _in the ietf process_ i too allow other to use the works.  but it ain't
> in the ietf process unless the wg adopts it.  which is when i change the
> clause.
> 
> randy

fwiw I agree that this is quite legitimate. I've never done it, but
I can imagine circumstances in which I might do so.

     Brian

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status