RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Thu, 05 December 2019 21:05 UTC
Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CA61200F6; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:05:16 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=FZpJI5CU; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=juniper.net header.b=ar1uIw8l
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Tz4q9gcx56iU; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:05:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 254401200EF; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:05:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xB5Kvg3a015970; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 13:05:00 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=Y/RQ2E0cbx/7gXRhcqfrIHZODgcq8STlqQbzOw8h/tw=; b=FZpJI5CUXHDFRlVE5sJiIppBOTcFeEIpv6zKqsf9W2QzF0hJ5DuhFi0cFGlWYYjkZpxn I25/DnA2bjSpq0HQdpWA3f8fjnxKxWDh+vKUkkZEs/gXLEiIjL+t4Efb9oLpkwDOt65x YuQaUKONVpYJ1KDp6Sac0nbiWFpCmDNJVwDk07VlJSMeVzRD/WFeyVv4zXLsgISkwiGq 6dPS0ejOi1Cen6CAzcY9I7OgJ0agkFnHNT1PDNOIIwgLIs9lqdSVoKC5fR/kBuyA54+x xxzrgW4KMQFFreLwP3cPhijXQPwNCCSmgMZiTzdMt7mzF0IENKbg2y94x4ya1SakuuuK sg==
Received: from nam10-dm6-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-dm6nam10lp2107.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.58.107]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2wpfd32skt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 05 Dec 2019 13:05:00 -0800
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=c3qzUZISdskuMGWZS6ol9E5Tf3NyP7E+8bhtIA6yFU7GYldJb+7VI5rg+gw+VQYT3Su84s3EFF/fz+U53VyS5uZ/GJCtsdto7duRlUiEJdkyi7Mi50hiwYzj7HdZ0u7G+bF550JKNEmrArmW6bsvdnva9YoA2/E2m1iEULdpTOAMoerou98PSjjqI/Did5xEPusyGdYQ31MDTHp4kR+8HsOz1YNTYgabTewhCFDrU4OCrr3lucK+HV04wQXkjRjFynegaHoZNKUN6E5lIYlr2YXCGl09WksO17vvrJitaPMAuYifORhPSoWAbtIsuglZtuc6JcVD1T/N59ShynNCIQ==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Y/RQ2E0cbx/7gXRhcqfrIHZODgcq8STlqQbzOw8h/tw=; b=Fl0j/6ZR0GObezZ9Lw3KKBFW59GGzt5IOi3owZWTvJP9w3w0SJl+ZgBccY6oa/7Ikpk3h4GaKBaO0xNZfw+9JDqW9xzowCLN4INWrrDiWL2AHEE3BStK4zzRlXj8Xgkwq84KA5x/sEshC6ZCAw0oV1XpMtoeGfePmckmkDsEM1rjwDR+dU4Mnyz8PNdhcEmzLlZrsUD58Ge9wpO6ygSEnmd93PFhZuSMxkHmJcGw2BixhOloHuszcmjlmwNKtVe/9FVgXdxpvpF/4dEjsNIk9zv6gLQ2yNj5eN/z0qEajSg8EgjLZIjKgiajEoluD9qougrUtbnN074RuJaV4NX9yQ==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=juniper.net; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=juniper.net; dkim=pass header.d=juniper.net; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=Y/RQ2E0cbx/7gXRhcqfrIHZODgcq8STlqQbzOw8h/tw=; b=ar1uIw8lDl3A3x6FXRFFy/Vx/x1IMtOZoxHqGQmBbgoyQ7XgTJzAHQj4iMqODVmJB+dxWbdJ4mbo/KeGv9cnCGisosbpf1s/DSAmNBNaZA0Wei91FbkM1hGdqigjXwE2NRacnRXaZWz2XsCmGFxYk9yZp74HixYQzjHp3FMyDiA=
Received: from BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (20.176.28.88) by BN7PR05MB4274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.250.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2516.8; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 21:04:58 +0000
Received: from BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::185e:d297:6499:4987]) by BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::185e:d297:6499:4987%7]) with mapi id 15.20.2516.003; Thu, 5 Dec 2019 21:04:58 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org>
CC: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>, SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Thread-Topic: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping
Thread-Index: AdWqwAHVKZEn9oMNQKewBt9OvTlYXgAzAekAAAP9pMAABKKQgAAAP1wA
Content-Class:
Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 21:04:58 +0000
Message-ID: <BN7PR05MB56996FFC117F512EEA04AFC8AE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <BN7PR05MB56998A05469327E759B5B671AE5D0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3AD3BD11-8C34-41FE-B88F-49A9F2561D78@cisco.com> <BN7PR05MB569946D6AA5C6B78AFC05F6BAE5C0@BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8DEDE597-B7B0-48F5-959E-69757315C2AC@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <8DEDE597-B7B0-48F5-959E-69757315C2AC@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
msip_labels: MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Enabled=True; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SiteId=bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Owner=rbonica@juniper.net; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_SetDate=2019-12-05T21:04:57.1038921Z; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Name=Juniper Business Use Only; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Application=Microsoft Azure Information Protection; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_ActionId=a3c05110-48ba-4dfa-95eb-9dbfadfeb545; MSIP_Label_0633b888-ae0d-4341-a75f-06e04137d755_Extended_MSFT_Method=Automatic
dlp-product: dlpe-windows
dlp-version: 11.3.2.8
dlp-reaction: no-action
x-originating-ip: [108.28.233.91]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: cc4f0a6b-d2de-4a6f-79dc-08d779c6c94c
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BN7PR05MB4274:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BN7PR05MB42746C5615A7C9C2C6347EECAE5C0@BN7PR05MB4274.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:7219;
x-forefront-prvs: 02426D11FE
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(346002)(396003)(136003)(366004)(376002)(199004)(189003)(13464003)(5640700003)(14454004)(1730700003)(81156014)(316002)(81166006)(8676002)(229853002)(2906002)(55016002)(478600001)(33656002)(54906003)(9686003)(4326008)(8936002)(99286004)(26005)(7696005)(186003)(6916009)(5660300002)(76116006)(25786009)(66446008)(64756008)(305945005)(6506007)(53546011)(102836004)(66556008)(66476007)(71190400001)(71200400001)(66946007)(76176011)(11346002)(52536014)(74316002)(86362001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BN7PR05MB4274; H:BN7PR05MB5699.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cc4f0a6b-d2de-4a6f-79dc-08d779c6c94c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 05 Dec 2019 21:04:58.2843 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: iT1lCyhOI6XPLAodtuEzBd6jqOt+NQwXaSkZO9Uv7QAAyTm5x9I0c8mFG5eAYolP3MRVsOXAftw1HTSVYHQDmw==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BN7PR05MB4274
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-05_08:2019-12-04,2019-12-05 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 bulkscore=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 phishscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912050172
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/BQtldm_qcxk8dhocirIL4ndjLto>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2019 21:05:16 -0000
Ole, Point taken. Could you comment on the current state of WG consensus? Ron Juniper Business Use Only -----Original Message----- From: otroan@employees.org <otroan@employees.org> Sent: Thursday, December 5, 2019 3:57 PM To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Cc: Darren Dukes (ddukes) <ddukes@cisco.com>; SPRING WG <spring@ietf.org>; 6man <6man@ietf.org> Subject: Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping Ron, > Currently, there is no consensus that IPv6 allows insertion of extension headers by intermediate nodes, even if those intermediate nodes are segment endpoints . Given this lack of consensus, the authors of network programming have wisely agreed to remove header insertion from the draft. > > Likewise, there is no consensus that IPv6 allows removal of extension headers by intermediate nodes, even if those intermediate nodes are segment endpoints. Why, then, have the authors of network programming not agreed to remove PSP from the draft? With regards to working group process; may I gently remind you that it is the chairs that call consensus. Best regards, Ole
- Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… otroan
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: … Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Enno Rey
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Bob Hinden
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ron Bonica
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- RE: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Ole Troan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Andrew Alston
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Sander Steffann
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ole Troan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't seem… Suresh Krishnan
- RE: Separating issues (was Re: [spring] We don't … Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Joel M. Halpern
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… otroan
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Fernando Gont
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Darren Dukes (ddukes)
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Robert Raszuk
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Tom Herbert
- Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Pop… Tom Herbert
- Re: [spring] Network Programming - Penultimate Se… Robert Raszuk
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Fernando Gont
- Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Mark Smith
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Joel M. Halpern
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain jmh.direct@joelhalpern.com
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Brian E Carpenter
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Warren Kumari
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: We don't seem to be following our processes (… Ron Bonica
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Sander Steffann
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain otroan
- RE: [spring] We don't seem to be following our pr… bruno.decraene
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Tom Herbert
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- RE: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Ron Bonica
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Gyan Mishra
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Fernando Gont
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Gyan Mishra
- Re: topics to circulate Erik Kline
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: topics to circulate Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: IPv6 header insertion in a controlled domain Alexandre Petrescu