Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)
"Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 23 January 2014 12:34 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47CDC1A0430; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:34:28 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cdQEI07gkFKl; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:34:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE06E1A03E6; Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:34:26 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: (with DISCUSS)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 4.90.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140123123426.16950.38439.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 04:34:26 -0800
Cc: 6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org, ipv6@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 12:34:28 -0000
Brian Haberman has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-16: Discuss When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCUSS: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- I am taking the somewhat curious route of raising a DISCUSS on a document that I am shepherding. I will return to a Yes when these issues are resolved. Thomas Narten raised a good point that this document does not mention the work published in RFCs 4436 and 6059 (from the concluded DNA WG). Two of the points he raised are worth addressing in this document prior to publication. 1. [Resolved] - Storing addresses is going to raise privacy issues. 2. DNA provides some ability to manage the Network_ID component of the cryptographic hash. For wired networks, that may be quite useful as long as the Network_ID can be stored securely.
- Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stabl… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Stephen Farrell
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Fernando Gont
- Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-stabl… Brian Haberman
- Re: Brian Haberman's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-s… Brian Haberman