Re: New Version Notification for draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-05.txt

神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> Fri, 28 February 2014 22:53 UTC

Return-Path: <jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73451A0156 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 3.821
X-Spam-Level: ***
X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.821 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, CHARSET_FARAWAY_HEADER=3.2, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6SB_o9RvXT3T for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CDC11A013E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id u56so1101963wes.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:52 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=CsZupdGsRWzfMq35TsJHF4pKtrErtnmsQlYpx4wCSt0=; b=GKHsWMhv29+YDCAdNvcPgEqJ0x9cVpQ6OmlNW3MgtEyXlA3cCzi3njZW0YO/22hoVm AGllAw4KRw2VnE72ee0A0qfrwMGRiH5nrPEoka7dcAzJ4qhq9qUyVgp1QVZU3yCSEwPr +om8YjZkBYirFLMHUvIEvYYT7ScdbLtnq8kV9i+TTsYp4hmqWmP/G0HK/BztV+I9repq rgpcL6J9zDrdflgTOSqqX+cCUEcljY1uc+GG1j736OApFW8AuYDvc2PmioCuLJGKNOmu fOkfa8yXpniEz7fkGk/y5wW7QkoG0PfZ9S5/Eyt65BST/L/gdMzyJV3aEc8/4lGKfPhQ uX/w==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.78.16 with SMTP id x16mr306670wjw.86.1393628032548; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:52 -0800 (PST)
Sender: jinmei.tatuya@gmail.com
Received: by 10.194.120.167 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:52 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <530FA94B.3050802@acm.org>
References: <20140214235734.2509.63069.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <52FF115C.30001@acm.org> <CAJE_bqdOiO2zyCvxsO4sEW+9ZMb0DoOyscNWP1=jedrBbbBkEA@mail.gmail.com> <530FA94B.3050802@acm.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 14:53:52 -0800
X-Google-Sender-Auth: jjm0AGJZLtWcNqttcHUKGKwWA9Q
Message-ID: <CAJE_bqdF2-nH7GaC+j6PnRagDC0jDj0c0me6MOC6AsHNvDaedQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-chakrabarti-nordmark-6man-efficient-nd-05.txt
From: 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
To: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/C0k85DDIQplMDs_QxSnv8hEEJUs
Cc: IETF IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Feb 2014 22:53:57 -0000

At Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:08:27 +0100,
Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org> wrote:

> But we seemed to not have edited the rest of the draft correctly around
> DAD, including the bootstrapping section.
> As the draft currently stands DAD for link-locals is (or "can be" given
> the lack of editorial clarity) replaced by NS/ARO. But address
> resolution for link-local targets needs to be done for using multicast NS.

I don't understand how it works in the bootstrap stage.  To send the
NS/ARO for a link-local address (on bootstrap), the host should first
know the registrar's address.  But the host can't get the information
by unicast RS-RA exchange since the source address of the RS would
need to be the link-local address to prove unique.  Or am I
misunderstanding your intent?

--
JINMEI, Tatuya