IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Sat, 07 August 2021 18:40 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 700913A0799; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 11:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o-mpR489vkeE; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 11:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com (mail-ed1-x52e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D529A3A0797; Sat, 7 Aug 2021 11:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id b7so18194252edu.3; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 11:40:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hSgTHoZU8I773qRvI6B01ZAIuPItAF+X/WWjPZoRu/I=; b=YiUngMyDpWYr0gzHIlZzcLFyac59KEtpjKPiBw2DWNGgiVimbKDc9XL9l9zc8+ud80 /kHvW8Pnq6JTzSmDG6XVMT37Tk1IO7CTDANkGWHN/5pRRaJ3MeUZyiKJuavP1V3sNbjY Ruh04qTi6rpl6YqktYrjGm81jO4KyNcALHgVMHhXxghyPeonZ6Q/znQvMh1jWGeXrAY1 Vf/dltWMQe9pwGwBC5iIc84scYul6hmfTpi4Z3XfHa8jMytszjoEqplsXZukXC4TVSye qFKnonmcHpavJu1H024/D9rbNHbsj9VWTf7e9zM+VlLqDz/TDxPLLn7ka4gg46DdP3Yj aGhg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hSgTHoZU8I773qRvI6B01ZAIuPItAF+X/WWjPZoRu/I=; b=dccfXcNcxZZJbUoqWWeywahOPzwqkXi5/Kq2e6gN2jWxC/A6V8yqvQPXZCIcMw+u5X tzFVFjbvU0++0eDl7EtVMOeu7NjhDSj0SAk2/VO9CeVgvBdlL94hg17dc0SFQKmzJ3qq g0DhLErdZHOLN8vOdl8K2XtK+VMUiCWueEGMp8Farh5dSZ/0IA3BPomtN7YPYhrtlabs f/BLUWldIEUwyHl5miI2JuUo7hNtykxMlzo4/eyFlRuSKtUAbzSILnFSQDSKCoD3WoMH 4LVgRqrM9yigO9IFDsNrFmgg7nCdne5MYf8otMs5ZIustSYPV4RtQehSbkiuymNU3qnY WE5w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532K27oOldMjzyWMBVe2PBTKXNvErRymI/tTcFwXj72hydnrcLo0 XQpP+v3BKkv6HqnAKyTTbAp3EnONYhXs0mCd/90=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyBOHn7RHo4mfFi7et3U4YQCcp6prXZ+HOmceg9w9CFlVrNrIvAIOVEt6YIgt0SimCHqUmntO80LE0IjpmOeak=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:3193:: with SMTP id di19mr2002977edb.183.1628361600605; Sat, 07 Aug 2021 11:40:00 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <db8c1a5534e9412ebcfa37682d75f862@huawei.com> <C23D7023-B5B7-47C6-8AC5-65A98822A724@lurchi.franken.de> <CANMZLAZGawUjRhSSE_rA8AyqMx=mx1WFeJ_tZq0KVEXJd2XBfQ@mail.gmail.com> <20210807014730.GA28901@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CAO42Z2yezZh5-B0PwCuNt2FUMAW-FjMK8QZ8uL4TsPhs26zziw@mail.gmail.com> <20210807151716.GA3098@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de> <CALZ3u+a_7XQ+R8mV+9KzwRwxa0riP-QD_2R69ycV0NL9jy_S3Q@mail.gmail.com> <20210807175410.GA63079@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
In-Reply-To: <20210807175410.GA63079@faui48f.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 21:39:47 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+aqL_c49QtAaMKCtje8XWaKiUTOWLwO53eg2H88F1LmuQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: IPv6 Anycast has been killed by LINUX patch in 2016 - who cares?
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, IETF discussion list <ietf@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c5217c05c8fc7a2b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CFlfN_ovoiugybdWbc4WtdZJVak>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Aug 2021 18:40:09 -0000

Peace,

On Sat, Aug 7, 2021, 8:54 PM Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

> Aka: what linux does is a perfect lightweight form of
> MP_TCP just without the overhead of different IP addresses
> or port numbers to identify different flows.
>

Please correct me if I'm wrong, but this is exactly the opposite of what
MP-TCP is/was going to offer, which is the same flow, transferred via
multiple 5-tuples.

And here we have different flows over the same 5-tuple.

--
Töma

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email