RE: Reducing the battery impact of ND

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Mon, 17 February 2014 13:41 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4221A03E1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:41:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -15.048
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.048 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, LOTS_OF_MONEY=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.548, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2qJpEasKEeFR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:41:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C581A01EA for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 05:41:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1118; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1392644482; x=1393854082; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=hdb5e4aB5luHRqSMmnssiin0SUhEQBfOuZMbCayJd0k=; b=SOF4JYE1ecG/Xq0ract/FjHLJJJIL3HCKhZFOoe2Gyk7WYgnG8z5dVx4 upmyYBIIDpWUd6tqfApjyk8k/T7uMIPKo4cHmXG63Ek7RoT2qBNQ3lNC1 C7KkbVQ8h5LUlZP/yiHvjDj1kGwaVQApMtZW/5MC++i2VApTRfMtMevHm s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah4FAMcQAlOtJXHA/2dsb2JhbABZgwY4V4MCvDYYgQYWdIIlAQEBAwEjEUUMBAIBCBEEAQEDAgYdAwICAjAUAQgIAgQOBQgMh2kIDal5oVoXgSmMcDcxBwaCaTWBFAEDqk+DLYIq
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,860,1384300800"; d="scan'208";a="106143890"
Received: from rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com ([173.37.113.192]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 17 Feb 2014 13:41:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com [173.36.12.77]) by rcdn-core2-5.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id s1HDfKIl031106 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:41:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.68]) by xhc-aln-x03.cisco.com ([173.36.12.77]) with mapi id 14.03.0123.003; Mon, 17 Feb 2014 07:41:19 -0600
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: ek <ek@internetdraft.org>
Subject: RE: Reducing the battery impact of ND
Thread-Topic: Reducing the battery impact of ND
Thread-Index: AQHPF8uCi/rGSSFcckK5k2X6Rw6QUJqdO7yAgABDuoCAAA28gIAC6/EAgAGb2ICAF694gP//1Ttw
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:41:19 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115E3B8D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <52D96663.6060005@sonic.net> <CAKD1Yr3pCQ15uFz36MvKG3Q_Vzt27ws0aG1=94377FFaJtWV7g@mail.gmail.com> <52DA0ABA.8030903@acm.org> <CAKD1Yr1zSfAOv8j9XgB_ph9uaUUNW0yrJhfjJTsSTYHNKYNx9A@mail.gmail.com> <52E03BB4.8040309@acm.org> <DCA1F00D-0775-4030-A3BF-700F01F98C35@employees.org> <52E0423A.5070906@acm.org> <01DC3532-C73A-4644-A323-04BE6231AADA@employees.org> <52E9EF2D.9050402@acm.org> <2CFF305E-DE44-4D57-82D3-241196D94610@employees.org> <CAHw9_i+0DKS7pTFmRaajdX0=R9yhY7=6gXs2nV_vEKqEsz=d2Q@mail.gmail.com> <52ECA6EE.1080201@acm.org> <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B89115D182D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com> <1315813580.259590.1392631505190.JavaMail.sas1@[172.29.252.247]>
In-Reply-To: <1315813580.259590.1392631505190.JavaMail.sas1@[172.29.252.247]>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.246.66]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/CbikAl0e3OgHMaT7Gg2IfDc5ddw
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Andrew Yourtchenko <ayourtch@gmail.com>, Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 13:41:26 -0000

Cisco IPR should not block this work.   There are several drafts in the IETF that are underway with IPR from Cisco and other companies. 

Hemant 

-----Original Message-----
From: ek [mailto:ek@internetdraft.org] 
Sent: Monday, February 17, 2014 5:05 AM
To: Hemant Singh (shemant)
Cc: Erik Nordmark; Warren Kumari; Ole Troan; 6man Chairs; 6man WG; Andrew Yourtchenko
Subject: RE: Reducing the battery impact of ND

 > If the community is interested in supporting a new ethertype for IPv6 ND, please let me know.  I would expedite an I-D from Cisco who has IPR related to the new ethertype.  See  >  > http://www.google.com/patents/US8102854 
 
I haven't read this, but, IMHO, the potential existence of IPR about using a new ethertype for NUD messages is a wonderful reason to *never ever* do this.