IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC3484-revise and NAT64 Well-Known Prefix

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Mon, 28 March 2011 05:53 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1CE3A6814; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:53:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kOv2ki7Im5Et; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E32C3A6813; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:53:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so1205979gxk.31 for <multiple recipients>; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent :mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=jYtL6IVUJZaQX84Xta0ttpY+UzIWhH5JFrShYjyCMn0=; b=LRiRp1raVwbc4WZapVk5218YN+V2lF/1a68VfgeVUHVAneO7iDaeLhcZae5KW09Llv 6e/vQa2Wa7zIXKZFOC9wi/XdynZGmrcqIcvGWszlYC9qeFE91iGyVqJxOtXquISTvNIN mjsUnn9njjxnjs/zO/qx7fPefBDpvdAmolGH0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=wt/PMvcFbAxhaQFLMu40rroouwQdLfQBfnlTCRht+yf95dXUPpzxrqh34YiDCJ0a6j tMKzb8h4gVwNkbugxOSOQY6ZRqhcDBegtCkwICG3jKudxZc6MLv2F2dytiXGE2ZKoW7f 5pWg3g3biJ7D6fJ4z0iV3NstYX6/5rY9+P7qI=
Received: by 10.150.31.16 with SMTP id e16mr3683633ybe.227.1301291709299; Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:55:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [130.129.71.154] (dhcp-479a.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.71.154]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b4sm48878ybn.8.2011.03.27.22.55.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Sun, 27 Mar 2011 22:55:08 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4D9022B6.8020105@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 18:55:02 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Teemu Kiviniemi <tekivini@csc.fi>
Subject: Re: RFC3484-revise and NAT64 Well-Known Prefix
References: <916CE6CF87173740BC8A2CE443096962014C5D@008-AM1MPN1-036.mgdnok.nokia.com> <alpine.LRH.2.00.1103272227310.13893@sampo3.csc.fi>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LRH.2.00.1103272227310.13893@sampo3.csc.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "behave@ietf.org" <behave@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2011 05:53:33 -0000

On 2011-03-28 08:53, Teemu Kiviniemi wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Mar 2011, teemu.savolainen@nokia.com wrote:
...
> I believe native IPv4 should always be preferred over NAT64. 

That is just irrelevant and of no importance, since the only hosts
that use DNS64 and NAT64 in normal life are IPv6-only hosts.

There is a side issue of what happens if a synthetic IPv6 address
is referred to a non-IPv6-only host, but that is a whole other
problem that cannot be solved at the RFC3484bis level.

See draft-carpenter-referral-ps-02.txt...

    Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email