Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)

Töma Gavrichenkov <ximaera@gmail.com> Thu, 22 October 2020 21:00 UTC

Return-Path: <ximaera@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BBA3A102D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:00:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TZbUECRbsIrR for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8BE3F3A1024 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id h6so2779993ybi.11 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:00:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UvK0Psp9Wl+vUL/daFaNb7BZbA/x0AUtcmbIuawM7vM=; b=npY13oVniAE9ilnTnco3/7Z2raIpTF9+Og6Kf2c5ieG5EPwL0zMTaaNx3CsxQqOSTE dPAwGulK7vcL5Z0Ww6N1ECa4klDpH+1c20N5vpsFsO8Mdt4uuuL/q9ZboGFUEHETGmDz E4HU4mgDeixsdym0P9+1GKHHwd/Y5+QKlmBdclFV32uQZfdYJXvPs1V6/X0pWxAuULss RYJwRvSl3xe2IQTPpNPMaP5+iDrINoCumT8WQOS7AGhwmiRe4Lzw4VNDB49Lzyfuml8i +D5uvisLUJQrPpC3Bly3HNVP2/aZ7/VnSNR2jtHdZE8TyyXgLe6tYX7sdUtR36c/XeRE o5zw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UvK0Psp9Wl+vUL/daFaNb7BZbA/x0AUtcmbIuawM7vM=; b=siPv3HYYb3D3gZUo//a4LFsGSrIrIgq1BE0q07Y9Qpt2NAyl24F7Uh9yC2S6iY0bxq DRxMo9WOSl7S+4NoovHkbYxAEb88+DjlGh+qGqhtBbh6hR8cGwxodZvosUtwhthM9cWb WZPmsikCmNQiMhjjPoNh5zuSeMv5Hr8JoQT0pGZiPqKer92xIyuCGTRndXOEZgjTTlZh Ou0JSC03we6BV2j98bnkSNa5o3MYcBFvaofbvNvMrTL1rP21+Uk6CMPLgr0Lk7LLKGJC CW1JyxTqXgk+mNO8kUqCQB6YoJqSgSVTZCRwoRcfZjRO9f9ucvwKLsH6EhzRoGG2e2St 7Znw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5307Zm07/fkDP/CiAsAfdD6099h2QUmtOrAQEzshWcHQ9umbzIbm 6DgITTMQAgLVblPJYKKKiqBSyY3n35ApdHURf1Y=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyWnaCh2sDFuqfI51az7cYdB9Q7d9AlGnzdUHepM7LVvj/7Mci0nCOICuqInCEzHBSqxApM6Y6juSJeg0u66C8=
X-Received: by 2002:a5b:18a:: with SMTP id r10mr5524057ybl.482.1603400450517; Thu, 22 Oct 2020 14:00:50 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20200501110357.90D62F40722@rfc-editor.org> <CALZ3u+avjk-N726U8ZxVrhsjEcXaTC5iwCmdZQYahM+fqhntJQ@mail.gmail.com> <e2ea372f-4841-f82c-12a2-d0ba2694ca37@gont.com.ar> <CAJE_bqcYwa4FLsEL3y0Sf2ae=sK_L-1SMz382dkzVAW9MxoSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAJE_bqcYwa4FLsEL3y0Sf2ae=sK_L-1SMz382dkzVAW9MxoSAQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: =?UTF-8?Q?T=C3=B6ma_Gavrichenkov?= <ximaera@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2020 00:00:38 +0300
Message-ID: <CALZ3u+ZHeDq5FLu2yL3UE0336o07PSDHrzd=NwAT3kmyfkk2Mw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC4443 (6153)
To: =?UTF-8?B?56We5piO6YGU5ZOJ?= <jinmei@wide.ad.jp>
Cc: Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>, IPv6 IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, aconta@txc.com, none@rfc-editor.org, mukesh.gupta@tropos.com, bob.hinden@nokia.com, Daniel Ginsburg <dginsburg@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/DQDAvScSIiaCyIWJRwp1yMjdywU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2020 21:00:53 -0000

Peace,

On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 7:58 AM 神明達哉 <jinmei@wide.ad.jp> wrote:
> I don't have a strong opinion on whether to approve the erratum, but
> if we do so, I'd keep this part of the original text: "This condition
> can occur only when the scope of the source address is smaller than
> the scope of the destination address

This particular phrase is actually incorrect.  Scope zone is not
scope, and per 4007 zones, not scopes, should be considered.

--
Töma