Re: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids> update to rfc2464bis

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 13 January 2017 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A203E1297C4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hazpL4QiAjuG for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com (mail-pf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F6812978C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 127so22154791pfg.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:53 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=dSHMutc3On8P6w6ECd1MnSEMYJUuZZujYd1ExsZWJbs=; b=blL4N3PXShdFqQPrlK9baQaYBoJLf6aCbVgSKVFDOhoWq6JYgdQfuJZ538dF603gjJ yxOR2W+aAVXBqKekq3vbjDEWfzbqLoXmxuyTyzW1NJPf9qkvVss+dS86EOkAmgcgjXUe hZ7BWHxJ8GsL83r43HIAX+XZHbqMKiE99O5Gp1p76/B69PT59e/56nSFMcK90uqnXCV8 YziX27jyqQrJVCIbLvpmWppwaKfPnxWcT9c2yJdlNLbf4nKTluFbZ+3lzEoRQrgT+fUG k3eu+i9iTNDf7nsLxP7talnCbhFWNXCXcH6+uulpVyTJCRQW7VFggBB8PT4juH7P1nrt zFXA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=dSHMutc3On8P6w6ECd1MnSEMYJUuZZujYd1ExsZWJbs=; b=Sx/LOQJ0CgIWwWAANYi1rseWrl1McW6dBKaA57PSGDATZ22Abn51J4bZaI1hRcXf+g EsIOWHB3bu26eJo/dMMeAwh+wVV0raZZC8oqdGE4pyVx0ll6eotINnU4m90WAbNaQ2LZ zokchXCAVlxhcOixp1nE3gtp6k4D//ercvSxd+WljrI5MzZF14U/61gxAPaZU103CxLE CKh6hcQGr+N9lfCNkAcb3Jx4IyH5t6Aj5JhwqiELDu6rDeOyXj0ZD3pz0kSuyYd0s0Tc QRLQ6SCT/vURyg0WuMJl+s86nQoFDCj/vy7nUqqNaKihTUGGEGJFB0EHd445v9UQAbvD u8iQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKc/v0LzfrPMcoC3nDkUOBXL2FE1Bi0Ej3r0S+MZXCBrn0lzmeVXuj3wCM/JzcOTQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.3.5 with SMTP id 5mr21249207pgd.150.1484273272654; Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ?IPv6:2601:647:4d01:db10:400a:b890:2046:4b74? ([2601:647:4d01:db10:400a:b890:2046:4b74]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c15sm24485882pfd.36.2017.01.12.18.07.51 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-default-iids> update to rfc2464bis
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr1kCsokQbv4DHJaUjALJ6F06Layq6L_vFa6zYBPODejkw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 18:07:51 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <C1EE8FB6-20BB-421A-A93F-B814957AF2CE@gmail.com>
References: <1E7F90AC-79BB-49BE-B397-EC829EA95AA4@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0O6gnXZc3qEY7bqkBYu-sx1_erwum2DRwpe+Vv+jmdiw@mail.gmail.com> <30097699-804D-40EA-8EAE-6D4745FE5E5C@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1kCsokQbv4DHJaUjALJ6F06Layq6L_vFa6zYBPODejkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Ewi18vqClz-G_r9-SI2JbPERSp8>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2017 02:07:54 -0000

Lorenzo,

> On Jan 12, 2017, at 5:27 PM, Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> wrote:
> 
>> On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 8:57 AM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
>>    It is not recommended that Interface Identifiers for an Ethernet
>>    interface be based on stable IEEE MAC-layer addresses.  Earlier versions of
>>    this document described a method of forming interface identifiers
>>    derived from stable IEEE MAC-layer addresses called Modified EUI-64 format.
>>    This is described in Appendix A of [I-D.ietf-6man-rfc4291bis] and is
>>    no longer recommended.
>> 
>> That is, add “stable”.
>> 
> That works for me.

Good

>  
>> Would it then make sense to be explicit to add a new sentence like:
>> 
>>    This approach may be used to create Interface Identifiers based on non-stable (e.g.,
>>    random) IEEE Mac-layer addresses.
>> 
>> with a reference to the appropriate IEEE specification.
>> 
> Yes, that's great.

Good.

Do you have a reference to a document that defines random IEEE mac addresses?

Bob