Re: Starlink --- "simpler than IPv6"

"Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Mon, 19 October 2020 15:20 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85D83A0489 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:20:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wAYwrsGnGUeL for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:20:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.144.163]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16AC83A0408 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id 09JFKe6L013741; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:20:42 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com; s=boeing-s1912; t=1603120842; bh=G3/uh79CJutAvgqsjKul/t28IJOIVG3/sp+uwHsvM00=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From; b=nHDAXbJR9d8+TDZG9JhTJUMkz4AihJdHLeDYNO3n3ZGgfav03/jdcaqAU4eMRVlGh RUaiO3bylZxYi5H40/v3f9xtr/BbE0mHVNnq7FFEVGxaSPcjS5gpOWqS6kouDFf/TK iFSil9389h6rqe1wZ288wZOO5GKlCX59q6zy4KcV1EBvbuS1Dq8RqgF0GZZ4bbeL7g V8lAbjt1cXuKfRts6LRK3H9ohKE2VcX8tNpNASXuWbmJokxjjwAI3rdhUBvUpt/zb1 KbBnuPLTcYeCh5OFizVYEN2lEH5QwTWWe4bqkrOnZKkeUH61t5UI0TAwWrGzlz3WZ3 k4cL3TH+G4hVA==
Received: from XCH16-07-11.nos.boeing.com (xch16-07-11.nos.boeing.com [144.115.66.113]) by clt-mbsout-02.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id 09JFKY6E013675 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 19 Oct 2020 11:20:34 -0400
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.112) by XCH16-07-11.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.113) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id 15.1.2044.4; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:20:32 -0700
Received: from XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5]) by XCH16-07-10.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::1522:f068:5766:53b5%2]) with mapi id 15.01.2044.004; Mon, 19 Oct 2020 08:20:32 -0700
From: "Templin (US), Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>, Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: Starlink --- "simpler than IPv6"
Thread-Topic: Starlink --- "simpler than IPv6"
Thread-Index: AdamKy+OCrvYXKKlS8eHo1KODLUqMQ==
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:20:32 +0000
Message-ID: <a8dc258cca214efd902a717e08c5bda0@boeing.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [137.137.12.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: EE9365B5CCDC3D6B809EBD15A510ACAB4C315BF3D9F35F9A4DDB0CC941E3BBEB2000:8
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_a8dc258cca214efd902a717e08c5bda0boeingcom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FSYQ6ST2HyzqTdrU9ZegCLDm6uo>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2020 15:20:46 -0000

Seems like an “IPv6-over-foo” document might be in order; anyone care to
join me on that?

Fred

From: Behcet Sarikaya [mailto:sarikaya2012@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, October 19, 2020 8:14 AM
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>ca>; 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Cc: Templin (US), Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: Re: Starlink --- "simpler than IPv6"




Thanks Michael, I'd like to know as much as possible how IPv6 works in Starlink.

Behcet

On Fri, Oct 16, 2020 at 3:47 PM Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca>> wrote:
Anyone read anything more specific about what Starlink is doing that is
"simpler than IPv6"?

I'd sure like to know that it permits end-terminal to end-terminal
communicatons without a trip through a data center.

--
]               Never tell me the odds!                 | ipv6 mesh networks [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works        |    IoT architect   [
]     mcr@sandelman.ca<mailto:mcr@sandelman.ca>  http://www.sandelman.ca/        |   ruby on rails    [