Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 21 February 2017 00:06 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D8512946A; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xSVy8NZxLNs1; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x244.google.com (mail-pg0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 669A2129479; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x244.google.com with SMTP id a123so12227663pgc.3; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kUk/0JsIsMzQPKIzAyK5tjau7EaJyJ8AynOh97AtNRY=; b=FlPgJT8bcdPDSIGTn5y0py5vA4WWap2rgMBD2fugKZEFck1v+bf8wHzRbsveyA1GsZ G0zj0mtjZBlUKU+O06IHqxeIphXZDNLnDwKDJpMEHL9dP8ybUmnR3kjqpdp8w4fKS/hu 1g41G0gbY20q/WO9Qpq1DfwJkclwHkeCghzOa982RccrXKilsrUlS1Zgkh5GCOojWaGQ Xp4S/1Eof/pkFTqrNdI5WM5ExWEaAlRWc7UIEPT4L9vO0ovq1zZM8AST7W0MlOyMaFE+ 6rt/HKGd0/nhGakd0F0Z7E9Wt4H7nnDC8Fnv62Pf8G6EKb963OTw8iMxaelkPZiJDvXs buTw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kUk/0JsIsMzQPKIzAyK5tjau7EaJyJ8AynOh97AtNRY=; b=E5WUmD18iHBzMeT255p1jVcSY9i99Q2UDW5R3Kd94j9KQkvGSsOipQ9O1qs77OPMnr LpaE0io6gbYw9jd+SBbXA8gUgkDdra6Z1P5h/T2NgUlOkK9vPsdS4bfsvlnoFUuDD1IJ wADArX0uUKXiASMzSn8Ci2xzZaECyxaARVM9P9XrLysKmewJF2bvaukIq7OeGoKzZQFH 3Uwm/v+H+8RLhVSZ7e66QfTjHyWy/1Sco9eo5Sh23ee24ulA6xNWRTsxYawmIKa31pQi BbvvGmIHChtVcc+/mRHjKdpEI+59NsIE3CcQz6t2W++N0DlugT8aUC/kaxWyEh5yCY7k qeEw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kd+idZGUrJUS+MM/KfD1zPD/dDtPQAfJcZODM3FEFwqavOfYI8NmtrpVSiOZ/awg==
X-Received: by 10.84.231.205 with SMTP id g13mr35865151pln.30.1487635596085; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.15] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y201sm26881882pfb.16.2017.02.20.16.06.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:34 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20170220235734.GA84656@Vurt.local>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 16:06:33 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <77A662EB-1466-4F73-8105-E33F152D4824@gmail.com>
References: <d9dc153a-61a8-5976-7697-ce1ecc9c8f3f@gmail.com> <4AF83EE6-6109-491F-BE66-114724BB197B@employees.org> <m2y3x6eutl.wl-randy@psg.com> <B76B6864-5827-4AC1-9BF7-8FFF069C10F1@employees.org> <m2lgt6ed7j.wl-randy@psg.com> <4514E052-25C1-4C85-AB1D-0B53FD9DA0E1@employees.org> <CAN-Dau3VriYNUf96yZEFMMV+-4WCxBz94Lkqfg3OsCUAbVYhaw@mail.gmail.com> <660929B4-158B-453F-9B5F-6C029F9699FA@employees.org> <E093E86F-41F5-4485-A8D3-761831F9AAF8@google.com> <ECF27195-4A6B-4AFC-8950-83876F333BD4@employees.org> <20170220235734.GA84656@Vurt.local>
To: Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/G8P_SrC8fF9Bi9Kzv6vzhsSV2Yk>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF-Discussion Discussion <ietf@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2017 00:06:39 -0000

On Feb 20, 2017, at 3:57 PM, Job Snijders <job@ntt.net>; wrote:
> We must accept that we cannot see into the future. Let operators choose.

That, of course, was the point of RFC 7608.