Re: [IPv6] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8754 (7102)

"Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com> Thu, 01 June 2023 02:29 UTC

Return-Path: <ddukes@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25229C151552 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2023 19:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="J5SjFsRN"; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com header.b="ImOLH+d2"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R_Ez8qG3_I-i for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 May 2023 19:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DAEEC15152E for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 May 2023 19:29:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=27178; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1685586578; x=1686796178; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=mZdJG2QwMy9v5D5mzjaUol8olMJYNP9gIom911BRggs=; b=J5SjFsRNPCeoau/nvSSOpyB9P0O3I1UYQ+YQzQc2QErgaUdl3Lvnbmq6 8YHJ90M/ARqLiXyUDVYd+vj15fUKdVDjc1xkkEvI4QyBvQkmwSmK/6bBo E4M2h2Q/DHV1RG25PEM+5YE3//l7/LpowffFbX6JMPZZCApH5RlnxPZDE Y=;
X-IPAS-Result: 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
IronPort-PHdr: A9a23:mwcvZhDFXM4DgPeS5aeSUyQVohdPi9zP1kY9454jjfdJaqu8us6kN 03E7vIrh1jMDs3X6PNB3vLfqLuoGXcB7pCIrG0YfdRSWgUEh8Qbk01oAMOMBUDhav+/Ryc7B 89FElRi+iLzKlBbTf73fEaauXiu9XgXExT7OxByI7H5FpPRgt+f3OGp8JqVaAJN13KxZLpoJ 0CupB7K/okO1JJ/I7w4zAfIpHYAd+VNkGVvI1/S1xqp7car95kl+CNV088=
IronPort-Data: A9a23:lzaVV6l1hdBrYkdm/gxKQhvo5gz4JkRdPkR7XQ2eYbSJt1+Wr1Gzt xIWDDzQb/bcNmumc99/adi09kxSu57cmtJrTANqrCo9FVtH+JHPbTi7wugcHM8zwunrFh8PA xA2M4GYRCwMZiaA4E/raNANlFEkvU2ybuKU5NXsZGYpHWeIdA970Ug4w7Ni29Yz6TSEK1rlV e3a8pW31GCNg1aYAkpMg05UgEoy1BhakGpwUm0WPZinjneH/5UmJM53yZWKEpfNatI88thW6 Ar05OrREmvxp3/BAz4++1rxWhVirrX6ZWBihpfKMkSvqkAqm8A87ko0HN9HakxI0xijpOEr1 tt9h5m1SSItJISZzYzxUzEAe81/FaRC/LmCKn+lvInKiUbHaHDrhf5pCSnaP6VBpb0xWj8Ir KdecWtUBvyAr7reLLaTRuVxhck4BMLqJ4gY/HpnyFk1CN54HMyeHfiXvre02h8Lrf5sLNH9W /E7MwF3NR6ZPxhkIksuXcdWcOCA3ymjLGIwREiujasv/Tb7zQFt3v7qKtW9RzCRbcxRmkDdr WXc8iGgRBobL9eYjzGC9xpAm9MjgwveA4EZC+WV3MVb2kOd9l4WDR0zUUGS9KzRZlGFZ/pTL Ekd+ywLpKc09VC2QtSVY/FeiCPZ1vL7c4cKe9DW+D1h2YKPuVbEWjRsoippLY146Z5nHVTGw 3fUx7vU6SpTXKp5oJ533pidtze7PyR9wYQqOnJcEVBtDzUOXOgOYv/nR9JnFuu+icf4XGi2y DGRpy94jLIW5SLq60lZ1Q6f695PjsGWJuLQ2ukxdjn1hu+eTNX4D7FEEXCBsZ59wH+xFzFtR kQslcmE9/wpBpqQjiGLS+hlNOj3t6vYbWKM2gEzTsRJG9GRF5iLINE4DNZWeRgBDyr4UWSBj LL74FkIv8YDYBNGk4cuO9zuYyjV8UQQPY21Cq+LBja/SpNwbwSAtDp/flKd2nuFraTfuf9XB HtvSu71VSxyIf0+lFKeHr5BuZd1nXpW7T2IGvjGI+GPjOD2iIi9E+lVaTNjr4kRscu5neki2 4wOaZfWlUUEDbyWj+u+2dd7EG3m5EMTXPjeg8dWbeWEZAFhHQkc5zX5nO1Jl1BN90iNqtr1w w==
IronPort-HdrOrdr: A9a23:cvJWIKskvJjFaLJ8hCb8wGWR7skCxIMji2hC6mlwRA09TyXGra GTdaUguyMc1gx/ZJh5o6H+BEDhexnhHZ4c2/h3AV7QZniZhILIFvAu0WKG+V3d8kLFh5VgPM tbAs1D4ZjLfCRHZKXBkUWF+rQbsaO6GcmT7I+0owYPPGNXguNbnnpE422gYytLrXx9dOIE/e 2nl7N6TlSbCBAqh8KAa0UtbqzmnZnmhZjmaRkJC1oM8w+Vlw6l77b8Dlyxwgoeeykn+8ZtzU H11yjCoomzufCyzRHRk0XJ6Y5NpdfnwtxfQOSRl8kuLCn2gArAXvUhZ1TChkF0nAic0idprD D+mWZkAy210QKUQoiBm2qv5+An6kdo15at8y7fvZKpm72JeNtzMbswuWseSGqX16Ll1+sMiJ 6iGAmixsNqJAKFkyLn69fSURZ20kKyvHo5iOYWy2dSSI0EddZq3MQiFW5uYeE99RjBmckaOf grCNuZ6OddcFucYXyctm5zwMa0VnB2GhudWEANtsGczjATxRlCvgEl7d1amm1F+IM2SpFC6e iBOqN0lKtWRstTaa5mHu8OTca+F2SISxPRN2CZJ0jhCcg8Sjnwgo+y5K9w6PCheZQOwpd3kJ PdUElAvWp3YE7qAd3m5uw9zvkMehTIYd3A8LAq23EigMyOeFPCC1zwdGwT
X-Talos-CUID: 9a23:yQ6/UmOE8Hv0CO5DfXJk/1FMN+oeQyfDwkfiJkq4LGJzYejA
X-Talos-MUID: 9a23:sF5TAAaWtfWV9+BTjBTSpgBFF/tTwf6VEBkHyMkDkNGYDHkl
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
Received: from alln-core-1.cisco.com ([173.36.13.131]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA; 01 Jun 2023 02:29:27 +0000
Received: from alln-opgw-2.cisco.com (alln-opgw-2.cisco.com [173.37.147.250]) by alln-core-1.cisco.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 3512TRrF004428 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK) for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 02:29:27 GMT
Authentication-Results: alln-opgw-2.cisco.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@cisco.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=ddukes@cisco.com; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) d=cisco.com
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.00,207,1681171200"; d="scan'208,217";a="2266698"
Received: from mail-bn7nam10lp2103.outbound.protection.outlook.com (HELO NAM10-BN7-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) ([104.47.70.103]) by alln-opgw-2.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 01 Jun 2023 02:29:26 +0000
ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=dBpap9Igcb01E0ONoLQZCsneWBsgtysydX4cJ5Vgb0SpSfjvQNF2ZVvPjEVYdZeSy0hBnpmKB4fDEcM7zWbduDS3fHK0uf4B8iiJvFrzEKa5fHvWg+Lnw341Nb54tntFHAg9GDXZWs5SzvuqYq4xLNlq9LVi3K8vOtpTBDuXma2avlC+Ez2ocAANRywtPejtbd9GS0A2LIgWJ3o7Q9LPPGoGbkE/ikUGvw6y+lKvTGFEq6aN4dISNGuJ9IZZTCekGI+2/BbtjKaIXHghjDxMkmdyXLBuM11ZDIGaJ33oP/qCmr5/hRX9XyQvQVrZVn+vsebWgrehg8nx5XOQbq6eYg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-ChunkCount:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-0:X-MS-Exchange-AntiSpam-MessageData-1; bh=mZdJG2QwMy9v5D5mzjaUol8olMJYNP9gIom911BRggs=; b=i2IxiEgClV4004cGRWKowlitFzlVA05bXPF5VigYMEfyA0/ywmye/lQm2tVR+H9AQa+nMsoce+7PtsK0T3EEwsrDoTQd/541mGBGZ1RayhflNA+s9XLYFnIh3a7FOfaPoz3JrsfmafrM9JvYiC+VQzYGUYjUXQtMkvzX/+a+RE7ef8LMG7AgXvYtm2dyVu7Vy58v7XPtW1nCOtxKfGR1bEMNcfCDV31DW3qNOi0LUrIbI4QNCFFe9pfjUaAvEZ13rjUOV5xqpIdQTc84mn9F7kwdxZnd8CYKq7bsTNEl9GFI5KQD8EuDMmjHsq2STgLWq7CGzna0WBDN2WROzjXKMA==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=cisco.com; dmarc=pass action=none header.from=cisco.com; dkim=pass header.d=cisco.com; arc=none
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=cisco.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=mZdJG2QwMy9v5D5mzjaUol8olMJYNP9gIom911BRggs=; b=ImOLH+d2wlEuEyXaMKBqh1CzoDPU1GFWtOc63oL+ZMznpRgs4JFSwFlogYrfreY4n0LJ9ciz9eEgP8O0uXP/x1h68JmhO8hzL0qSBG6LY53S1cnp1i5tkUnR5zvm4bPA1cd+t561QO+vt2JfDrjHmX/D7Owkwie7NgtowM/cvFs=
Received: from BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:208:31c::17) by PH0PR11MB7634.namprd11.prod.outlook.com (2603:10b6:510:28d::15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.6433.22; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 02:29:24 +0000
Received: from BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9a78:3206:24c3:8581]) by BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::9a78:3206:24c3:8581%3]) with mapi id 15.20.6455.020; Thu, 1 Jun 2023 02:29:24 +0000
From: "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes@cisco.com>
To: Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>, Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
CC: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "stefano@previdi.net" <stefano@previdi.net>, "Clarence Filsfils (cfilsfil)" <cfilsfil@cisco.com>, "bob.hinden@gmail.com" <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, "satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp" <satoru.matsushima@g.softbank.co.jp>
Thread-Topic: [IPv6] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8754 (7102)
Thread-Index: AQHYtyf1BTE2mG32hkeR9EWlxkAmKa9zjs6AgAA3o4CAAAUYgIAAB+AAgACy5LWAAEiOgIACJG6w
Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 02:29:24 +0000
Message-ID: <BL1PR11MB53668B6AA53A70820A7CE036C8499@BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20220823193827.8334B877CD@rfcpa.amsl.com> <CAMGpriUPOnWWBYynvbH=2CL_4FgAD6Yut1SMKOuqHzEwXEHJZQ@mail.gmail.com> <0d88478a-34a2-3f48-20bc-a6b057d9a3a3@joelhalpern.com> <CA+RyBmUbxiTQ8MazXTpUXFzRLBRNeUNAEATG=cGbRCiX3GiYEQ@mail.gmail.com> <e3908883-f0c9-c0a0-79d1-5fe6ae128d36@joelhalpern.com> <BL1PR11MB5366AECDC2328A425C105BBBC84B9@BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <6fa56677-df7f-83df-e8c9-052e0591a9fa@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <6fa56677-df7f-83df-e8c9-052e0591a9fa@joelhalpern.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-CA
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BL1PR11MB5366:EE_|PH0PR11MB7634:EE_
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a0f4b34e-6d93-4b7c-76f1-08db6248039c
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-relay: 0
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-forefront-antispam-report: CIP:255.255.255.255; CTRY:; LANG:en; SCL:1; SRV:; IPV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; H:BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com; PTR:; CAT:NONE; SFS:(13230028)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(136003)(396003)(346002)(451199021)(83380400001)(186003)(6506007)(110136005)(2906002)(26005)(53546011)(54906003)(9686003)(5660300002)(4326008)(166002)(52536014)(86362001)(66574015)(478600001)(66476007)(8936002)(66946007)(66556008)(91956017)(8676002)(33656002)(66446008)(64756008)(76116006)(71200400001)(316002)(122000001)(55016003)(38070700005)(966005)(7696005)(41300700001)(38100700002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101;
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-chunkcount: 1
x-ms-exchange-antispam-messagedata-0: 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
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_BL1PR11MB53668B6AA53A70820A7CE036C8499BL1PR11MB5366namp_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: cisco.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthAs: Internal
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-AuthSource: BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: a0f4b34e-6d93-4b7c-76f1-08db6248039c
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Jun 2023 02:29:24.0454 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 5ae1af62-9505-4097-a69a-c1553ef7840e
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: HcxBf927taazSAfoXOoOUnteewzSIDFYk8AFeWsJazOFZ5Nom3BViXMqOQAhS05mlRjuJeAg6EX21brnFoajXg==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PH0PR11MB7634
X-Outbound-SMTP-Client: 173.37.147.250, alln-opgw-2.cisco.com
X-Outbound-Node: alln-core-1.cisco.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GRL1mU1miTNZXnsEvoxFuOMem1g>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8754 (7102)
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Jun 2023 02:29:43 -0000

OK, let’s stick with “Segment List”.

On 2023-05-30, 1:46 PM, "Joel Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com> wrote:


I am inclined to "Segment List", but can live with "Segment List field" if others feel that is helkpful.

Yours,

Joel
On 5/30/2023 11:12 AM, Darren Dukes (ddukes) wrote:
Hi Greg and Joel, I’m happy with:

Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
Specifically, for the SRH, the number of unprocessed
128-bit entries in the Segment List.

It’s the more precise description. Now “Segment List field” or “Segment List”?

Thanks!
Darren

On 2023-05-29, 10:46 PM, "ipv6" <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org><mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> wrote:


Good point.  That works for me.  That wording seems better than simply relying on people understanding "remaining".

Yours,

Joel
On 5/29/2023 10:17 PM, Greg Mirsky wrote:
Hi, Joel et al.,
as I understand it, segments are not removed from the Segment List. If that is correct, then, according to the proposed definition, the value of the Segments Left field is constant throughout the lifetime of a given SRH. But that is not how it is supposed to be used, Right? I think that the following might better reflect the use of the field:
NEW TEXT:
Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
Specifically, for the SRH, the number of unprocessed
segments in the Segment List.
Similarly, following up on your point about the need to use more general terminology:
NEW TEXT:
Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
Specifically, for the SRH, the number of unprocessed
128-bit entries in the Segment List.

WDYT?

Regards,
Greg

On Mon, May 29, 2023 at 6:59 PM Joel Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com<mailto:jmh@joelhalpern.com>> wrote:
I think there are two issues, both easily resolved.

Given that different people may have been reading the existing text
differently, I think that we need to make sure 6man agrees on what it
should have meant.   To solve this, we "merely" need folks to speak up.

The second issue is that we want the wording to end up correct even when
we add compressed SID containers, without introducing a normative
dependence on a WG I-D.

The proposed clarifying text currently reads:

Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
Specifically, for the SRH, the number of segments
remaining in the Segment List.

If I try to interpret that looking forward to compressed SID containers, I end up confused as to what is intended.  (I know what the various pieces of pseudo-code add up to, but the definition should be clear.)  I think the following may help:

Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
Specifically, for the SRH, the number of 1228 bit entries
remaining in the Segment List.

I had earlier thought that maybe we could say "the number of 128 bit SIDs or SID containers", but I fear that would produce an improper dependence since we don't have containers defined anywhere.

Thoughts?
Joel

On 5/29/2023 6:40 PM, Erik Kline wrote:
> There has been a request to engage in some word-smithing before
> returning this to Verified.
>
> May I ask that it be put back into Reported state while this is discussed?
>
> On Tue, Aug 23, 2022 at 12:38 PM RFC Errata System
> <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org<mailto:rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>> wrote:
>> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8754,
>> "IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)".
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> You may review the report below and at:
>> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7102
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> Type: Technical
>> Reported by: Darren Dukes <ddukes@cisco.com<mailto:ddukes@cisco.com>>
>>
>> Section: 2
>>
>> Original Text
>> -------------
>> Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
>>
>> Corrected Text
>> --------------
>> Segments Left:  Defined in [RFC8200], Section 4.4.
>> Specifically, for the SRH, the number of segments
>> remaining in the Segment List.
>>
>> Notes
>> -----
>> RFC8754 describes “The encoding of IPv6 segments in the SRH” where IPv6 segments are defined in RFC8402.  RFC8402 describes binding SIDs and adjacency SIDs for SRv6. Both these SID types identify more than a single explicitly listed intermediate node to be visited.
>> The current definition of Segments Left only indicates it is defined in RFC8200, and RFC8200 defines it as “Number of route  segments remaining, i.e., number of explicitly listed intermediate nodes still to be visited before reaching the final destination”.
>>
>> Previous versions of draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header (0-11) referenced RFC2460/RFC8200 and described the Segments Left field by use in the SRH; as an index into the Segment List. This was removed in later versions (12/13) to consolidate the use of segments left to be specific to the segment processed (now section 4.3.1).  However, that removed the definition of its meaning in the SRH which led to the current issue.
>>
>> The corrected text restores the meaning of Segments Left for the SRH in relation to Segment List (which is not defined in RFC8200), while still leaving its use during segment processing to the segment definition (section 4.3.1 or future documents).
>>
>> Instructions:
>> -------------
>> This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
>> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
>> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party
>> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>>
>> --------------------------------------
>> RFC8754 (draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-26)
>> --------------------------------------
>> Title               : IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)
>> Publication Date    : March 2020
>> Author(s)           : C. Filsfils, Ed., D. Dukes, Ed., S. Previdi, J. Leddy, S. Matsushima, D. Voyer
>> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
>> Source              : IPv6 Maintenance
>> Area                : Internet
>> Stream              : IETF
>> Verifying Party     : IESG
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org<mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------