IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: RFC7084

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Tue, 10 December 2013 11:08 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF4271ACAD7; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 03:08:59 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.194
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.194 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jEKu4ZB1xKDq; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 03:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [83.247.10.6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B1101A1F54; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 03:08:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EDA653; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:08:52 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1wL1ciNd5Xvs; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:08:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:9e0:4:12:d428:4cf7:52f4:c052] (unknown [IPv6:2001:9e0:4:12:d428:4cf7:52f4:c052]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 532BC34; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:08:50 +0100 (CET)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.0 \(1822\))
Subject: Re: RFC7084
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 12:08:54 +0100
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F92E1B55-C74B-400C-B83E-6B50D175D121@steffann.nl>
References: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DC7BB@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0269@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCD72@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1822)
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "<ipv6@ietf.org>" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:09:00 -0000

Hi Mikael,

Op 10 dec. 2013, om 08:10 heeft Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> het volgende geschreven:

> From RFC4861:
> 
> M              1-bit "Managed address configuration" flag.  When
>                     set, it indicates that addresses are available via
>                     Dynamic Host Configuration Protocol [DHCPv6].
> 
> I interpret this as M=1 means addresses are available via DHCPv6, that means IA_NA and/or IA_PD, one or both might be available. I don't really understand why you do not. What do you think the M flag means? Reading the above text seems to indicate that you think it has something to do with managing the CPE?

As far as I know the M flag is linked only to IA_NA. As far as I can see IA_PD is not linked to the M flag at all.

Cheers,
Sander

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status