IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Feedback on draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01

Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com> Sun, 15 April 2012 06:19 UTC

Return-Path: <huitema@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD0221F863D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.539
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.539 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.060, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fD2lDiDMcxb5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:19:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from va3outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (va3ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [216.32.180.31]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD60321F854A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 14 Apr 2012 23:19:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail120-va3-R.bigfish.com (10.7.14.243) by VA3EHSOBE002.bigfish.com (10.7.40.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.23; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:19 +0000
Received: from mail120-va3 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail120-va3-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFAF380294; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:18 +0000 (UTC)
X-SpamScore: -12
X-BigFish: VS-12(zz179dN1432Nzz1202hzzz2fh2a8h668h839h944hd25h)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:131.107.125.8; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
Received-SPF: pass (mail120-va3: domain of microsoft.com designates 131.107.125.8 as permitted sender) client-ip=131.107.125.8; envelope-from=huitema@microsoft.com; helo=TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ; icrosoft.com ;
Received: from mail120-va3 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail120-va3 (MessageSwitch) id 1334470756989297_6327; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from VA3EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (unknown [10.7.14.249]) by mail120-va3.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC6D64C0046; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (131.107.125.8) by VA3EHSMHS020.bigfish.com (10.7.99.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.225.23; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:16 +0000
Received: from TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.159]) by TK5EX14HUBC106.redmond.corp.microsoft.com ([157.54.80.61]) with mapi id 14.02.0283.004; Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:15 +0000
From: Christian Huitema <huitema@microsoft.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: RE: Feedback on draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
Thread-Topic: Feedback on draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01
Thread-Index: AQHNGn3UDPx4Kw3MF0OxBylTRJLkeZaa55aAgAAQTwCAADCgAIAAGYaAgAAn4wA=
Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:14 +0000
Message-ID: <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA03CFD577@TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com> <1334276068.3945.408.camel@karl> <4F882A44.3080305@si6networks.com> <1334363774.3945.541.camel@karl> <CAAuHL_BCv2q=hDjTLmiviLoRRTbbyU+aSSQ0ETbDDQk==YfmLQ@mail.gmail.com> <C5B723A8-8A24-46BD-94E5-0BA2D8CCB460@cisco.com> <4F89DEE7.1080205@si6networks.com> <C91E67751B1EFF41B857DE2FE1F68ABA03CFD484@TK5EX14MBXC274.redmond.corp.microsoft.com> <8C04B19A-6E88-4544-8827-13BB4D672CFE@cisco.com> <4F8A3124.4090005@si6networks.com> <1BEEB247-8C36-4139-BF44-79E4993033E1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <1BEEB247-8C36-4139-BF44-79E4993033E1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.54.51.34]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org 6man" <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Apr 2012 06:19:20 -0000

>> That said, a more general question would be: should we include the (numeric) interface index rather than e.g. a 
>> hardware-specific I-D?
>
> Hmmm. I would tend to think that's a small positive integer, which isn't all that unique. Are you thinking of something 
> different than I am?

If the only purpose is to make sure that two interfaces on the same host have different ID, then a small integer is sufficient.

v2.29.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status