RE: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt>

"Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> Tue, 31 January 2017 21:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2811295A3 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.221
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.221 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9r1OPGaUWkIO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net [130.76.184.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC1A129ACE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id v0VL9hQS027822; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:09:43 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (xch15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com [137.136.238.222]) by phx-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.14.4/8.14.4/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTP id v0VL9W5X027638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 31 Jan 2017 14:09:32 -0700
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:eede::8988:eede) by XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com (2002:8988:eede::8988:eede) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1178.4; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:31 -0800
Received: from XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) by XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com ([137.136.238.222]) with mapi id 15.00.1178.000; Tue, 31 Jan 2017 13:09:31 -0800
From: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Subject: RE: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt>
Thread-Topic: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHSe/jcOKsyqkIydUqod4YdsWWHP6FTC7+wgACOSYD//3owYA==
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:09:31 +0000
Message-ID: <81186c98095f41388544da97351dd668@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
References: <D0A1D199-5EC1-42E0-8EAE-ADE6D4F8AA95@gmail.com> <88d5a5981f1245c39eda6f2ef6f4a70a@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <4A5D6617-DEBC-4F02-B63E-997C5E5F7C5A@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A5D6617-DEBC-4F02-B63E-997C5E5F7C5A@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [137.136.248.6]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GytraeGqF4UnAQPjdYtplzhKOxQ>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2017 21:09:45 -0000

Hi Bob,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hinden@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 1:07 PM
> To: Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>om>; IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt>
> 
> Fred,
> 
> > On Jan 31, 2017, at 12:39 PM, Templin, Fred L <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com> wrote:
> >
> >> value or the minimum IPv6 next hope MTU if that is larger.
> >
> > Spelling error - s/hope/hop
> 
> oops  :-(
> 
> Will fix in next version.

Or, leave it as is - either way; expecting PMTUD to work is at best a "hope".

Thanks - Fred

> Bob
> 
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
> >> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 11:33 AM
> >> To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> >> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
> >> Subject: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt>
> >>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> I published a new version of rfc1981bis (-04).  Links to the document below.
> >>
> >> The summary of changes in this version are:
> >>
> >>
> >>      Changes based on AD Evaluation including removing details about
> >>      RFC4821 algorithm in Section 1 , remove text about
> >>      decrementing hop limit from Section 3, and removed text about
> >>      obsolete security classifications from Section 5.2
> >> .
> >>      Editorial changes and clarification in Section 5.2 based on
> >>      IP Directorate review by Donald Eastlake
> >>
> >> A diff from the previous version can be found at:
> >>
> >> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt
> >>
> >> This is part of the project to move the core IPv6 specifications to Internet Standard.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Bob
> >>
> >>> A new version of I-D, draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt
> >>> has been successfully submitted by Robert M. Hinden and posted to the
> >>> IETF repository.
> >>>
> >>> Name:		draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis
> >>> Revision:	04
> >>> Title:		Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6
> >>> Document date:	2017-01-31
> >>> Group:		6man
> >>> Pages:		17
> >>> URL:            https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04.txt
> >>> Status:         https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis/
> >>> Htmlized:       https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
> >>> Diff:           https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc1981bis-04
> >>>
> >>> Abstract:
> >>>  This document describes Path MTU Discovery for IP version 6.  It is
> >>>  largely derived from RFC 1191, which describes Path MTU Discovery for
> >>>  IP version 4.  It obsoletes RFC1981.
> >>>
> >>>
> >