IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-olopade-6man-slaac-signaling-00.txt

Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com> Wed, 21 October 2020 11:43 UTC

Return-Path: <pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E443A1773; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:43:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nAEwI9JbaAa9; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:43:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (stereo.hq.phicoh.net [130.37.15.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E3433A1778; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 04:43:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stereo.hq.phicoh.net (localhost [::ffff:127.0.0.1]) by stereo.hq.phicoh.net with esmtp (TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305) (Smail #157) id m1kVCWw-0000GLC; Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:46 +0200
Message-Id: <m1kVCWw-0000GLC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
To: v6ops@ietf.org
Cc: "Olopade, Olorunloba" <Loba.Olopade@virginmedia.co.uk>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] New Version Notification for draft-olopade-6man-slaac-signaling-00.txt
From: Philip Homburg <pch-v6ops-9@u-1.phicoh.com>
Sender: pch-b9D3CB0F5@u-1.phicoh.com
References: <160313300387.7363.3016109002772518574@ietfa.amsl.com> <4c01bfac27744f4ba408fac1158fe7e3@UKKNOPEXCH008.systems.private> <m1kUsfc-0000E1C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <6253db31b1274f1297efc74371cc15f9@UKKNOPEXCH008.systems.private>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2020 23:18:54 +0000 ." <6253db31b1274f1297efc74371cc15f9@UKKNOPEXCH008.systems.private>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 13:43:45 +0200
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/GzcHXN3kVvXZ7m1GhjJUeF163QE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2020 11:43:55 -0000

> Not sure which mature solutions you are referring to. Are these
> standardised?

I'm talking about draft-ietf-v6ops-cpe-slaac-renum-05

I think the preferred solution to complement this is have something that
only changes the host. However, a solution that only involves hosts is complex,
so your approach might be a good option if a host-only solution doesn't
work out.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email