Re: [spring] We don't seem to be following our processes (Re: Network Programming - Penultimate Segment Popping)

[Fernando Gont <[e-mail]>]

On 7/12/19 13:03, Robert Raszuk wrote:
> 
> Exactly - That is why I thought  it does make sense to make this crystal
> clear to everyone here. 
> 
> From some comments it seemed that either folks do not understand or want
> on purpose to make false assertions only to mud the waters :) 

FWIW, I will wait for a few days for Suresh to answer the question I
have asked, and for the spring chairs and RTG AD to weigh in.

That said, I have already begun to write and appeal I'll (initially)
direct to the IESG as a whole. Besides, given that there's background to
this situation (what happened in the context of rfc2460bis), I will
raise the issue in other forums.

I guess it should be clear to everyone that we are being mocked at. And
I think the situation is unacceptable.

Thanks,
-- 
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [e-mail]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492