IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 11 May 2012 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02E421F86EE for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xtH8pgeT0F3O for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gg0-f172.google.com (mail-gg0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9F6521F86DD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ggnc4 with SMTP id c4so214863ggn.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=qGgq74huTcqRmjpSxiXa0xrQ6NqMbYVF9N3hcZ4IOTU=; b=V6YVvSc800MCrmkMCWmXYs05Tp1JT9OoZRY+05QPcm1mWUHshS22+dVpNBRaQ6Zkq8 Uy9IW6pebRvXz4iZfUaNQFUkNb4Ri0rQ1+GatbVxXK2yPrQNk4IPmwiZtdC7ycnAxwGM GsATNI9wg1uuxCXyZYg84pcpCh6zMfiTURjMo5kkngqxyL3URKd5CZcyG/j1mokbG8eu 0oMRhD5BmWdIh0O0nekTajHsMHB6JBnox+zYLtvhS4VBZ4xvqnjDuK16IsHN0ELY6Ixq oBq7+Y0I8f65gU0Y0rEKl6z4G81vGjKF1iK+NffSjPRKDATP5HTeoCC1wxgEZR/bjmyR sk9g==
Received: by 10.50.85.196 with SMTP id j4mr2393844igz.30.1336767171291; Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.140.217.99] ([80.187.201.110]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id em4sm4175496igc.16.2012.05.11.13.12.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 11 May 2012 13:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: Consensus call on adopting: <draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses-01>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <m2likzph8e.wl%randy@psg.com>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:12:28 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3646A828-DD8F-4A2C-B8F3-B9DE2FB4771D@gmail.com>
References: <E7607B61-9889-43A9-B86B-133BD4238BA2@gmail.com> <60CF6942-0D99-422A-8BEB-87A98B7F233D@employees.org> <4FAB02D5.9090300@gont.com.ar> <C2475E14-3A32-4A2F-839B-A61497E43B3C@gmail.com> <m2likzph8e.wl%randy@psg.com>
To: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fernando@gont.com.ar>, draft-gont-6man-stable-privacy-addresses@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 20:12:55 -0000

Randy,

>>> 
>> It is allowed and I don't want to start a big IPR thread here, but I
>> think the intent for this clause (no derivative works) is for work
>> that someone wants to present to a w.g. that was not intended to be an
>> IETF work item.  My opinion is that it's not appropriate for documents
>> intended to become an IETF work item as yours was.
> 
> i beg to differ.  i have used the restrictive clause for years exactly
> as fernando states.  if the wg does not adopt, then i may take *my*
> marbles and go home.

Thanks for saying it so clearly.  I choose to not do that as do many others.  I allow my contributions to be used by others in the IETF process.

Bob

v2.30.2 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status