RH0: disable by default draft
Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> Tue, 08 May 2007 04:58 UTC
Return-path: <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlHm9-0005IU-DE; Tue, 08 May 2007 00:58:13 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlHm7-0005IM-IK for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 00:58:11 -0400
Received: from eunet-gw.ipv6.netcore.fi ([2001:670:86:3001::1] helo=netcore.fi) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HlHm6-0007IV-2g for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 08 May 2007 00:58:11 -0400
Received: from netcore.fi (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l484w85K031750 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2007 07:58:08 +0300
Received: from localhost (pekkas@localhost) by netcore.fi (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id l484w8pd031747 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 May 2007 07:58:08 +0300
Date: Tue, 08 May 2007 07:58:08 +0300
From: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0705080751100.30920@netcore.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.90.2/3217/Mon May 7 21:01:19 2007 on otso.netcore.fi
X-Virus-Status: Clean
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.1.8
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.8 (2007-02-13) on otso.netcore.fi
X-Spam-Score: -2.8 (--)
X-Scan-Signature: 93238566e09e6e262849b4f805833007
Subject: RH0: disable by default draft
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Hi, We (me and George Neville-Neil) haveve just submitted an I-D on type 0 routing header processing. In the meantime, it's available here: http://www.netcore.fi/pekkas/ietf/draft-savola-ipv6-rtheader-00.txt Its approach is "disable by default, but type 0 routing header is still a part of a compliant IPv6 implementation". It identifies other potential approaches as well as well as lists some open issues. Joe's draft suggests deprecating type 0, so these are somewhat different starting points. Both seemed to gain significant support in the WG, so I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea to have two drafts. That way the WG can probably choose better which approach to pursue. [[ Personally I don't have a strong opinion whether we should disable or deprecate. Any rough consensus works for me.. ]] -- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- RH0: disable by default draft Pekka Savola
- Re: RH0: disable by default draft Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino 2.0