Re: [IPv6] [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-11

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Fri, 18 November 2022 20:25 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8787AC14CE2F; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:25:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.096
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.096 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id l4pb4iH-GHTc; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:25:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3692AC14CEE3; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 12:25:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id F090618010; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:50:39 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id SBqAPFKCzRLb; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:50:37 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (unknown [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2:56b2:3ff:fe0b:d84]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2775D1800C; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:50:37 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1668804637; bh=azpj+9qYKIcQ4L5UOfOGsaBmOnTnmzEZiwInoEFvpOg=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=EpCyYuCSMsjbcGFEy8W7Z+vh1UtxrHqlR+ugtOw64bH2ry+kcjCDEzLDFDzrebTic Z553b8yTh42BfSmQb/KN4pWiuy9RUPqO8KXtrC4XZUNhC60okrrn6+t/3SceChsRbO GXqA4761LcdyPAvAhhqxWKMNbg+r9A6QgAAYvHDxv6kCTAKniNevEzSjvLHNaBMdw/ IAn+DaHckDQuQ88q8Olxde1TrKeyOMxs9g3m8mXBpA1h74GMB0ZDiCHinfOZTrHPlO XfRnv7FGmGEhDA0JDHRi5eowm6n6XLLNckEC97X6pB1s7h+crRhEtJgBRbHP95P8XG /kd32vpb2ljmg==
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B4A05BC; Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:25:15 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
cc: Esko Dijk <esko.dijk@iotconsultancy.nl>, "carles.gomez@upc.edu" <carles.gomez@upc.edu>, "6lo@ietf.org" <6lo@ietf.org>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB48810D048FCD46EF7699BDE7D8099@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
References: <CAAUO2xxJ-Cksm6uL19LxpbH4q1nodCsKbUPUAd3UEH=SMRSokg@mail.gmail.com> <DU0P190MB1978629F28BA6FCDA71D8CF0FD079@DU0P190MB1978.EURP190.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM> <CO1PR11MB488180FB1C64F31CB61D3AFAD8069@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <1417.1668702765@localhost> <CO1PR11MB48810D048FCD46EF7699BDE7D8099@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7+dev; GNU Emacs 27.1
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <31427.1668803114.1@localhost>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 15:25:15 -0500
Message-ID: <31428.1668803115@localhost>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/HuOI1rRH2mnhUxkTI6cH2mVO8_Q>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] [6lo] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-6lo-multicast-registration-11
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2022 20:25:23 -0000

Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:
    > What if we start like:

Good.

    > " 3.  Overview

    >    This specification extends [RFC8505] and inherits from [RFC8928] to
    > provide a registration method - called subscription in this case - for
    > anycast and multicast address.  [RFC8505] is agnostic to the routing
    > protocol in which the address may be redistributed.

    >    In classical networks, [RFC8505] may be used for an ND proxy
    > operation as specified in [RFC8929], or redistributed in a full-
    > fledged routing protocol such as EVPN
    > [I-D.thubert-bess-secure-evpn-mac-signaling] or RIFT
    > [I-D.ietf-rift-rift].  The device mobility can be gracefully supported
    > as long has the routers can exchange and make sense of the sequence
    > counter in the TID field of the EARO.  "

    > Works?