Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 23:04 UTC
Return-Path: <fgont@si6networks.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3AA3A0DBF; Wed, 27 May 2020 16:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id RInPCQz7rftx; Wed, 27 May 2020 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from fgont.go6lab.si (fgont.go6lab.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::14]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B211E3A0D88; Wed, 27 May 2020 16:04:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2800:810:464:8801:f802:117c:8c81:54c7] (unknown [IPv6:2800:810:464:8801:f802:117c:8c81:54c7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by fgont.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB5FA280C33; Wed, 27 May 2020 23:03:54 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expected - Re: [spring] CRH is not needed - Re: How CRH support SFC/Segment Endpoint option?
To: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>, Andrew Alston <Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
References: <75BF2317-5D28-4038-ABB1-31C588ACD165@cisco.com> <DM6PR05MB6348D86E8BE339067C5238E4AEB10@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <30C37AC0-B03A-45B1-BE0F-7E185361BBBC@liquidtelecom.com> <CAOj+MME+kkfTKFQaS1zvW7wgQvLqui6jFQH9-eai6eY32t9fmQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Message-ID: <b5422c30-4b6c-3750-ec51-da3f9a903873@si6networks.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 19:58:17 -0300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAOj+MME+kkfTKFQaS1zvW7wgQvLqui6jFQH9-eai6eY32t9fmQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/HuSAlsmwl7L5ApPBWOdAt2z6_oA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 23:04:12 -0000
On 27/5/20 18:50, Robert Raszuk wrote: [...] > > I am not against CRH. But what I am against is that CRH/SRm6 authors > already bounced back via SPRING doors so they have chosen to try to > enter via 6man window. That is not proper style for any proposal. As someone that has experienced how folks have resorted to very twisted readings of RFC2460, and how they have undermined appropriate further clarifications in what became RFC8200, both in the context of what became RFC8754 and the ongoing network-programming draft (subject of an appeal), I find this statement kind of amusing. Thanks, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
- Long-standing practice of due-diligence is expect… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ron Bonica
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Andrew Alston
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Sander Steffann
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Erik Kline
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Templin (US), Fred L
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ron Bonica
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Andrew Alston
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Limited domains ... Robert Raszuk
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Mark Smith
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Fernando Gont
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Fernando Gont
- Re: Limited domains ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Xing Li
- Re: [spring] Limited domains ... Mark Smith
- RE: Limited domains ... Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Limited domains ... 徐小虎(义先)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Zafar Ali (zali)
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Templin (US), Fred L
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Robert Raszuk
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Sander Steffann
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Sander Steffann
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Robert Raszuk
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ron Bonica
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Gyan Mishra
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Henderickx, Wim (Nokia - BE/Antwerp)
- 答复: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… qinfengwei
- Re: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Sander Steffann
- RE: Long-standing practice of due-diligence is ex… Ketan Talaulikar (ketant)
- Re: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… 刘毅松
- RE: [spring] Long-standing practice of due-dilige… Templin (US), Fred L