IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID

Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Wed, 27 May 2020 21:49 UTC

Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC273A0C19 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:49:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id foyPEya6bF6a for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oo1-xc32.google.com (mail-oo1-xc32.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 973C43A0CAA for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oo1-xc32.google.com with SMTP id g22so5323426oop.13 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:49:38 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HY873+3sCw0ar5iIAhiUW6kqoo8aIYPHG277UmHJ84k=; b=lZQypQHvVOPh1TgP125p0QR17RjkYvhEsWR7cT1sIHfC5g1GkboAHgd6WbkP1rdILo W50SgJaew/lZeuxvxRLERkc27uO+rLr2CAeE3TbYif/XBaNbjEE+BEo/4K3FsLNhu7WP BX/wcVkb/ntqeKkJ1V+xdrWsmUSjsGSXp0mFSZDfAcVF4k/1nJThOELWzEAWx6+6lRzz C2PVtIltUZwfqqFp5rEOpw9hq+Op3ilbjNhSX+kxvdtXcQqRRKiHl+RAeWc5VsVhn3GF lOf8ZisHMZoLhqF1lBkzG9eEb0eH9EBEAYY1dzTdJWFJ/ThtwJG0HD1g4AT+05reGGRg N2+A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=HY873+3sCw0ar5iIAhiUW6kqoo8aIYPHG277UmHJ84k=; b=ltZkyI5YoQyZtE+YSSshSrbVK87hTR7pqO54aqn6gsy0nQ9hpQJJNkDPwJGjB0bj1Q mC6u2pJfFmF5Og75I9v+V/iKeEjeigGjpJ8iTnfKqqH+j2CkmkICeG97Cw4tVrrFgZKq UL1KzGetMZxXzmXNK4qu95OjCRckkOM/eqeLzqB42s0nPVmixUCZ6dBB4gWDPrU5JscB MgGa25LtLfjFZHXuCWM26/ReE7h4gWkUlJNL29KSkMMf3I/yHe1+5dDBYilXjQ1wfZR+ 648AZTpDi/atBKAqA3EZev4G5RlBtwXg8SS7ZkeZmHtEOVBqNjy4niMMYrZmijiytu7E z+KA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531kClWT6q9Nw2pPyFADS4Pi6seC0xA3jdwi5ZvPuC7nh/l2hlee 3AONpwa+qYouasKZ9LrtTEaCllggD0AZGOv7V3U=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzGwpAZWn4WtG9/VGG/uXe6yUHVvc+r6+3KHoFXN/ii94aai+pDkxY5G8AibPc+UHNwQHXKqHZ5R578Ttunf4I=
X-Received: by 2002:a4a:b995:: with SMTP id e21mr161683oop.93.1590616176523; Wed, 27 May 2020 14:49:36 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <DM6PR05MB63481B9B670790CC2DD792FBAEB00@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DBAPR07MB7016F554DFC574B0858721EFA0B10@DBAPR07MB7016.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAO42Z2xsHrtgZRFJ+msPP6aTGNaWzhEcaaTbROS4Ur_LNgngVA@mail.gmail.com> <B49E22B6-7B2B-419B-B7DF-47D6127AF214@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <B49E22B6-7B2B-419B-B7DF-47D6127AF214@juniper.net>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 07:49:10 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2zq+iXuneVESvB1UqggEJ3GFsmjTchEmr68oJmP4M2YKg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CRH Draft Updates - Renaming the SID
To: John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net>
Cc: tom petch <ietfc@btconnect.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/IqVImH0UUIO4WxMhr8HLBBdlXP8>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 21:49:40 -0000

On Thu, 28 May 2020 at 07:35, John Scudder <jgs@juniper.net> wrote:
>
> On May 27, 2020, at 5:27 PM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> CNID - Compact Node Identifer? (I've also discovered that hosts can process RHs apparently, so Node would match what is the RFC 8200 term for an IPv6 capable host or router)
>
>
> The collision with Calling Number Identifier (voice telephony) would be a little unfortunate.
>

Back in the 1990s Cisco used to publish a networking acronyms book.
>From memory, there were 3 versions of "SAP": - Novell Service
Advertising Protocol, ISO Service Access Point and something else I
can't remember.

I think TLA and FLA collisions are almost inevitable these days, so as
long as the contexts of use are different enough it's tolerable.
Avoidable would be preferred of course

Regards,
Mark..


> —John
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email