IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675-00.txt]

Erik Kline <ek@loon.com> Tue, 21 May 2019 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC8D1200A4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id u9ned97MTQbh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-it1-x12a.google.com (mail-it1-x12a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E050F12001A for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-it1-x12a.google.com with SMTP id i10so7502194ite.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.com; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=zap26VloNcJMKtgX4uzpuDBQC8ZgAb3962qYYz/aIDM=; b=OvDd3GZ8I7wt3QjsVg1xVHu8OUDfkBvsOYPwO3X81A90xE/FC8KAo2xbeui/raf6cz y/srfueuAuK5uANfp1ucZgL0wZlpzbj1QTtV0VrfRzcgPdJv3UHwl/JTu9fLg8KZ7vWh p1p/qurAeN6GfiNcyTlibJ9f4xvARGghxkshE=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zap26VloNcJMKtgX4uzpuDBQC8ZgAb3962qYYz/aIDM=; b=aO0kS3e0+4himNwsN8oWev8SncY24TsBKyI0o056S87k/0uqKaXYKJ8QtajJUeUaqx mJm/79Zbzex7/YH0JjHXGtrIhrbqGI8geU3x/aS5wkpPCX8D7TSdyUmXQ5Zt+7J+S8GP dg40aTU7nGy6o20Ajic4itYq9VotXuTxLihHaxPkqo6Jkq1eCbfp8yqsa7JwmkX8kd66 vRD9QJs83EI0XR6EM6M/3xHhLiqWnWVceH+2/Tn++WrdzGc/SGI/IE/jUbzG1iUYhVBB TP+wt/LM66UkiEqSwZQx6N0iLCU5uxSxcY6kNBdXI2APGEKozrC+3Zs8ZnzNi6KLt82k ncrw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWgCXztampLGaexbieaRKrrmAOwVuhz587IjoaWRuACV40cOlHM niT6tB4Z1ovgaIoXRgz1OqyOhEyBOYGDHMwmUsoOJg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyEWZAhonOrwN2UVdK8pZSctfwi5VCRXSCToCnP2aD9mB0tXx1ZhNyJ9x4H1iDh9eft4fnApchVIKLaWMnG+4Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a24:7bcc:: with SMTP id q195mr5438776itc.73.1558471901864; Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20190508125743.GA19360@tom-desk.erg.abdn.ac.uk> <19A018DE-280E-4400-95AC-7A3697ABE4B8@employees.org> <20190509062922.GA39281@profitmargin> <8e9b7085-78a7-4ad6-2e1b-73dcb1e0a15e@gmail.com> <6e3652d0-fed3-a672-16ad-ef3194dc13ed@dougbarton.us> <7280D1E3-8D42-48D7-8B99-F1D659123BD4@jisc.ac.uk> <BC60C287-2447-4007-8334-7AB569D88343@gmail.com> <192d82ab-57b0-dd20-4cb4-e198d31576a0@foobar.org> <7f020c5a-1ea6-8599-148f-1b6555454283@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7f020c5a-1ea6-8599-148f-1b6555454283@gmail.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.com
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.com>
Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 13:51:29 -0700
Message-ID: <CAAedzxrYtPwZw25iypTCjf_Uj6hj7qxRDABFP6QYSm+=dz4Aow@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [internet-drafts@ietf.org: New Version Notification for draft-jones-6man-historic-rfc2675-00.txt]
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Hilliard <nick@foobar.org>, Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>, "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000001aecb805896c04bb"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/J8Ch3kTlF4GwDa8lRpBgHuEJ_NQ>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 May 2019 20:51:45 -0000

On Tue, 21 May 2019 at 13:47, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On 22-May-19 00:31, Nick Hilliard wrote:
> > Gyan Mishra wrote on 20/05/2019 23:41:
> >> now in the mpls core I have deployed many networks to date bumping from
> >> 9216 to 65535 for future super jumbo for customers and host OS and NIC
> >> to eventually have enough memory bump mtu close to 65535 subtracting
> out
> >> mpls and misc overhead bytes.
> >
> > Not much networking kit supports MTU > 11k.
>
> Jumbograms were specifically designed on that assumption, hence the
> restriction to interfaces capable of supporting >64K MTUs and the entirely
> optional nature of the whole thing.
>
> Again, I don't see any reason to change the content or status of the RFC.
>

Agreed.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email