IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: a draft about on-link and subnet prefixes - the 4291bis impact

Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Sat, 18 March 2017 09:41 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5EB126B71 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 02:41:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.333
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.333 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AZX6PwhcwK9V for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 02:41:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (cirse-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.148]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B8A83129542 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 02:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by cirse-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id v2I9e0na034027; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:40:00 +0100
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BF8F2012E7; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from muguet2.intra.cea.fr (muguet2.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.7]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B83200FA3; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:40:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [132.166.84.69] ([132.166.84.69]) by muguet2.intra.cea.fr (8.15.2/8.15.2/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.4) with ESMTP id v2I9e07k027299; Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:40:00 +0100
Subject: Re: a draft about on-link and subnet prefixes - the 4291bis impact
To: otroan@employees.org
References: <CAJE_bqdd9OXOi+SZ8_OfGWXxEoKSfoR6=Lp3-_=vEaWbjx4udw@mail.gmail.com> <018c1f82-cd5c-7d59-f92b-9401ddfb11fb@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfGLngOuGzyTyRFrSOjn1kCkz3RBO0rojFCqqpYWgOZNw@mail.gmail.com> <97e0eff9-9f85-7f55-b3dc-c9b4a4b2bf62@gmail.com> <CAJE_bqexpdnrGfNkj09jv25Ng8J2MsNGVnjczM6ayeZqL2KfTA@mail.gmail.com> <80954d75-d07a-efe5-5906-dba8976dc563@gmail.com> <1ab36b80-ac73-abf2-0b6e-9f7e047d4963@gmail.com> <c220a756-55c3-f905-103e-e9fcb06a8729@gmail.com> <F43F74D7-53FA-4FBE-AAD2-A7B0C5E50404@employees.org>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <42a578fe-8992-2326-8245-660a00ad018f@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 10:39:49 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <F43F74D7-53FA-4FBE-AAD2-A7B0C5E50404@employees.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/JoIZ1h2jLzXbs_sWaMZ8TijdaRM>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2017 09:41:40 -0000

Supposedly, as we speak, there is some decision pondered over, about 
recommending (or not) 64bit IIDlens in 4291bis.

In making that decision, the onlink|SLAAC distinction should have no 
role.  It is not an indicator striking a balance either way.

Alex

Le 17/03/2017 à 23:20, otroan@employees.org a écrit :
> Alexandre,
>
> it is a little hard to understand what you want to achieve with your messages.
> if you want something explained, perhaps we should sit down in Chicago.
> if you want to have something changed, please write a draft and explain your proposal and your ideas.
>
> Best regards,
> Ole
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email