IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios

Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz> Tue, 05 February 2019 12:30 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@helix.net.nz>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBB9130E0E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:30:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.042
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.042 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.142, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iT3GxnDEUt8y for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com (mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::c2b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B1D4126CB6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Feb 2019 04:30:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-xc2b.google.com with SMTP id d190so1594546ywb.5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:30:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=helix-net-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=E1KoeA24RnVa0JB19HC5eTwMN3oks5sUylDYafJp8zE=; b=aqYGa7ogv4GDnjoL+4QDeEHr5VxdYV7xjqXr2Ji+Xh51bTWmwN5ObP5M40x2EtXoI1 sLIIRYk7bSZyflUr0kjvIi9JhEmSMT//z1LU6HQInB84d3FL0ZMEPJh5k0YASUyY+q9e BmQjxS09LJArwqadNUIRWzTwKAVDrXHk2oNXvqsv5sklNBvpdQhRCTn8MTSUiWc8Adhx JDh2FxcAGUL1FhFFn+E/ZY4BEmsBvHxXhai6Sl7n8dHTbPW+BFvvcORaNqM1VX4nk62e cY05AHp+9krb9Li+8dIcOJOZAgJ3iuBR/DIyC4Cg9U6Jf5Igym27Un//1KSnY/8QoSYR RvlA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=E1KoeA24RnVa0JB19HC5eTwMN3oks5sUylDYafJp8zE=; b=oDgWNs/C+rua3dFuzJE9mBysbe2zLP+hvprHs0QJj5/33/VI+EkJgknUh8Alrw1/7y GlqbaVa44mt+FYo13HmBgBmXFD0Fud/uXQ/FF0IKe23l9feyc0JOCg6aREdDr2TcsZUo sSi9edgXMI4HJNzNmnOyr2a/1OPVkDcCSzXyKtlpMn/C0+g/aiVZBMscSjdJYDbeVv4I OFe+PHLqBUjAPvszXd9ZR9aZTR8tmcpeTB1+o/YDbStaA7rdNoJt7AGLopEM+4csKV/H 68m6H9jZWJkcDB8nNfY53z22HMwjJZ8T9Ev4cAQD/wsPtFmXVSUQTuGgypQnQUGMutXB kqCA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAub9fcYfqqxBwNFVUgJljV7DKOO4SNLfvA8OYMCBwWTWMJtS6mDW PrMGGVnL1M7xKoMvRElgde0M7nFpVDQ=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IaS0nOiM4bVRRkj3+km+sBzmswzcRuHA9gC2s/NhkkxlaNi0rwaZ4DrH13CyebH9Xrhll8nog==
X-Received: by 2002:a81:3149:: with SMTP id x70mr3550057ywx.420.1549369834192; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:30:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-yw1-f53.google.com (mail-yw1-f53.google.com. [209.85.161.53]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a72sm1114928ywh.42.2019.02.05.04.30.33 for <ipv6@ietf.org> (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:30:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-yw1-f53.google.com with SMTP id p17so1624080ywg.0 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:30:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Received: by 2002:a81:e408:: with SMTP id r8mr3585852ywl.367.1549369833286; Tue, 05 Feb 2019 04:30:33 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <60fabe4b-fd76-4b35-08d3-09adce43dd71@si6networks.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1901311236320.5601@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1gpCcz-0000FlC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <ddd28787-8905-bafd-3546-2ceef436c8b0@si6networks.com> <m1gptWx-0000G3C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <69609C58-7205-4519-B17A-4FBC8AE2EA16@employees.org> <d40b41c3-ff1b-cab4-a8de-16692a78e8fd@go6.si> <D1E45CAD-08D0-43D4-90F7-C4DD44CB32C0@employees.org> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902041330531.23912@uplift.swm.pp.se> <77ecf321-b46e-4f25-7f68-05b15714a99e@si6networks.com> <CAHL_VyDdHuEAc9UdeiRp9f+c0tdzyoLwPY1rJbZmbWAuq96Uuw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1902051127510.23912@uplift.swm.pp.se> <m1gqyJC-0000FkC@stereo.hq.phicoh.net> <CAO42Z2wKh-vXmv=dNmr6oEmGnw09ajrr2geYJ=H1DbSYSm=VuQ@mail.gmail.com> <m1gqzYT-0000F5C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
In-Reply-To: <m1gqzYT-0000F5C@stereo.hq.phicoh.net>
From: Richard Patterson <richard@helix.net.nz>
Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:30:21 +0000
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CAHL_VyDL3Abo5i=YA+4zUsaF=t5D+G-nNqM9e35Zx+VjYnJGrw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CAHL_VyDL3Abo5i=YA+4zUsaF=t5D+G-nNqM9e35Zx+VjYnJGrw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
To: Philip Homburg <pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/K41alJ_8x9OF6-LNUxXFlhbsqhA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2019 12:30:37 -0000

On Tue, 5 Feb 2019 at 12:10, Philip Homburg
<pch-ipv6-ietf-6@u-1.phicoh.com> wrote:
> Ideally every customer just gets a static /48. There is no technical reason
> why this can't be made to work.

Not all network topologies can ensure a subscriber will always land on
the same BNG, and I'm not super keen on redistributing millions of
/48s all over the place.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email