Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt]

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Fri, 13 July 2012 16:12 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 559D411E8091 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:12:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.594
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.594 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.006, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zaBa8KbNJmgv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E96A11E8087 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 09:12:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from porto.nomis80.org (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:3e97:eff:fe0b:dd8a]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48952415D6; Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:13:11 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <50004916.4000206@viagenie.ca>
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 12:13:10 -0400
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
Subject: Re: [Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-uri-zoneid-02.txt]
References: <4FFD71D7.4070209@gmail.com> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B6BF582@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4FFF29E2.6090909@viagenie.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20120712152812.082ba6f8@resistor.net> <50001613.2090203@viagenie.ca> <6.2.5.6.2.20120713085321.095aaf60@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20120713085321.095aaf60@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2012 16:12:36 -0000

On 07/13/2012 12:00 PM, SM wrote:
> Hi Simon,
> At 05:35 13-07-2012, Simon Perreault wrote:
>> Have you heard of Postel's law?
>
> I try to be liberal in accepting arguments arguments from by
> implementers.

My proposal stemmed from Dave Thaler's argument... not sure what you're 
implying.

> I am conservative when it comes to usage of RFC 2119 key
> words.

The problem with RFCs these days is definitely not that they use too 
many RFC 2119 key words!

Simon
-- 
DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca
NAT64/DNS64 open-source        --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server               --> http://numb.viagenie.ca