IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt

Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl> Mon, 17 February 2020 17:53 UTC

Return-Path: <sander@steffann.nl>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D00120838 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=steffann.nl
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wr3g1XGFSedU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.sintact.nl (mail.sintact.nl [IPv6:2001:9e0:803::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F76812007C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 09:53:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3611B4C; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:53:13 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=steffann.nl; h= x-mailer:references:in-reply-to:date:date:subject:subject :mime-version:content-type:content-type:message-id:from:from :received:received; s=mail; t=1581961991; bh=tvUVpJE2pz2Qr/5GNvT HQtqyP0+SA/L0agnKtLixMq0=; b=KjIvMnZUhCUts2SYgOFch9llpUD+6QbdraA HW/lB+ZUF/bCGhgfd5bvEb1gF+itEzhJOgbkDOsQgz6mypyx/+x8PsQbVjRaZppl itVVPun3o2Q1BvCrR9QDC/7WEZG2viU70B3vHvGb6CpubdesWc6/zwuM4KHNaVl7 ibDkEhO4=
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at mail.sintact.nl
Received: from mail.sintact.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.sintact.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id sUCyMtN3NA0W; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:53:11 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:dd98:18ec:1a55:4146] (unknown [IPv6:2a02:a213:a300:ce80:dd98:18ec:1a55:4146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mail.sintact.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E9C344B; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:53:10 +0100 (CET)
X-Clacks-Overhead: GNU Terry Pratchett
From: Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>
Message-Id: <09CD4BEC-ED75-4267-A99B-22D1D936F7A4@steffann.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_3811185A-0545-431F-9F2B-91217FC7616F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3594.4.19\))
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 18:53:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: <207159C7-DD92-44D4-ACD1-6EF6200A0408@juniper.net>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: John Scudder <jgs=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <158190033563.5886.42675587901100238.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM6PR05MB6348721798E28750373994C0AE160@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <207159C7-DD92-44D4-ACD1-6EF6200A0408@juniper.net>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3594.4.19)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/KZSs1q5bKKHYrxh4mA4-2eGV_5U>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:53:18 -0000

Hi,

> I’ve reviewed this document several times at different points in its evolution. It’s clearly benefited from implementation experience and is a solid and clearly-written piece of work. Given that there’s demonstrated community interest in deployment, it’s time for the WG to pick it up.

Same for me, +1.
Sander

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email