IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: default-iids: dropping requirement 1 in Section 3

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Sat, 21 May 2016 01:40 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECEB12B04A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.126
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.126 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.426, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id K9jhQOKFf88S for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x236.google.com (mail-yw0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2175212B005 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x236.google.com with SMTP id o16so7644798ywd.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=/m1oRK/lPG090SwOyxWE6YaUNBFjkYjNImrR88KWHPM=; b=SF4P4l4EJYxk97l7mKox97qETbhBWNpfRNSQbUKGADPcN0l95dNy9fAuuQuec8veNR dnNLFny+VgXzzuRm+xGeCCek36XzauO8jHFxNja3IqZRBNqiXJTUaK346qK+rdlZfC30 SxJM5Rha2TAfF4+0tj2xMZC/jPSRuSJhABNz18O/ot8lUaWYNhD8r5ZbqmIoIcoDBBN0 k+um4YDa314OX0v6rs0aswg7nNukray1IEbi7XC/r83OD7ZzX4Cw/Gf0fCOVP2W3MB1R Caq1zpPOHm/9r25iGOr98LEtSxKnoTjCCVEhdT2AEJpU6ISJfC+xvDp+jmNY0i9wd3Hp 4Htg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=/m1oRK/lPG090SwOyxWE6YaUNBFjkYjNImrR88KWHPM=; b=ZM2oF7ZVjIEIlinSD4SXgU0klVxbeTP6FHNLWS9wWeWvJ0FCWFlLipkqqtMIgZjP5C m7XtdX1znqjcl4DuKvUrIkVcVeSnMOkaCRsPzBiXWYwrme9Xji2D42DZtZs1I0grJ0iG kQw2VEhvTAipluatJ1GkZE/zVLlXIbPxEBjsUJMYtor9NoxVW69s0B4LcGCx0vGmPsHh dej6LOd76VH+hOAAqD+oDViKhYDFw5voW/2F/cikS0DuKNXqJ+28/h8iUDqPXN/JVWWB arw24bC3Q+UZeq7QL1cmeMdQzfanruZp5zvhyPOKcNg4PGS1NX9jg1lOn7hZMnvtHO2m Cwbg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOPr4FXOgSzByKrw+YXqH9CdYF/9EVjiEyYC5rPQyLSqUqFNcgwK/uxc+AHR4wZxX0RMMQt3iWo1C7V+jvH8J7Vr
X-Received: by 10.129.108.208 with SMTP id h199mr3931043ywc.229.1463794835045; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.198.68 with HTTP; Fri, 20 May 2016 18:40:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <96468F91-2C94-4337-89CA-5AEEBB183ADD@cooperw.in>
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <89CA2C18-AE61-4D40-8997-221201835944@gmail.com> <6f2edbbc-d208-03a0-3c33-503a05c0bee8@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr1So_tFFSr=sk8ew-UJG-dWK=U6N9mwJnwkZdNX=__SVQ@mail.gmail.com> <11cf3f90-e693-a640-a372-f419a8f7a1a0@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0OPuSmp-OWG-+ZjDsHucQYTG2PMZw7jdiU=4kQqK+tyQ@mail.gmail.com> <663debf7-cfba-b19b-92ef-89cc66b452d8@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr2Km2A6XO8nvNv31Ti_Rr2j4gse1KLadJPcrgFMKyzszw@mail.gmail.com> <31E1F934-FEA2-4338-8F2C-04E7302F3170@cooperw.in> <CAKD1Yr052q0-xTkgLmL8UM=bXAEypDiGHuEhtOhwc3qpoZWbDw@mail.gmail.com> <53e5543b-ebc2-9ca7-5275-693027d44088@bogus.com> <44990b39-65df-79b6-7074-7f53ba4fe035@gmail.com> <351E5A99-235D-4CD8-A237-3C70FB8EBB12@cooperw.in> <96468F91-2C94-4337-89CA-5AEEBB183ADD@cooperw.in>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 10:40:15 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1B75Y9owqyB=krMS_GfiyqowgaRD2TBetP96N5ANoYtA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: default-iids: dropping requirement 1 in Section 3
To: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114db9042b2f2d0533504bf8"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/KvbpFdh7xvjj4mzOo6hdOckPT4Y>
Cc: IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 May 2016 01:40:38 -0000

On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 6:06 AM, Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in> wrote:

> (e.g., by implementing 7217 and using the randomized MAC as the Net_Iface
> parameter)


An implementer can't do that because it would be a violation of RFC 7217,
which explicitly defines Net_Iface as "An implementation-dependent stable
identifier". (The key word here being "stable").

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email