IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 13 October 2013 02:07 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B39011E8106; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:07:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -104.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-104.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.900, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s6TIpIacj1jr; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:06:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from co9outboundpool.messaging.microsoft.com (co9ehsobe005.messaging.microsoft.com [207.46.163.28]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1981E11E80FE; Sat, 12 Oct 2013 19:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail220-co9-R.bigfish.com (10.236.132.242) by CO9EHSOBE009.bigfish.com (10.236.130.72) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.1.225.22; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:52 +0000
Received: from mail220-co9 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail220-co9-R.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E54D62600B5; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:51 +0000 (UTC)
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:157.56.240.101; KIP:(null); UIP:(null); IPV:NLI; H:BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; RD:none; EFVD:NLI
X-SpamScore: 1
X-BigFish: VPS1(zz1432Izz1f42h208ch1ee6h1de0h1fdah2073h1202h1e76h1d1ah1d2ah1fc6hzzz2fh2a8h839h944hd24hf0ah1220h1288h12a5h12a9h12bdh137ah13b6h1441h1504h1537h153bh162dh1631h1758h18e1h1946h19b5h19ceh1ad9h1b0ah1d07h1d0ch1d2eh1d3fh1de9h1dfeh1dffh1e1dh1fe8h1ff5h9a9j1155h)
Received-SPF: pass (mail220-co9: domain of juniper.net designates 157.56.240.101 as permitted sender) client-ip=157.56.240.101; envelope-from=rbonica@juniper.net; helo=BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ; .outlook.com ;
X-Forefront-Antispam-Report-Untrusted: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(189002)(199002)(51704005)(69226001)(80022001)(66066001)(65816001)(63696002)(56816003)(77096001)(46102001)(74706001)(33646001)(74876001)(83072001)(51856001)(76482001)(53806001)(56776001)(54316002)(81816001)(54356001)(74366001)(4396001)(47446002)(74502001)(74662001)(59766001)(79102001)(77982001)(81686001)(81542001)(47976001)(50986001)(49866001)(85306002)(47736001)(31966008)(81342001)(80976001)(74316001)(76786001)(76796001)(83322001)(76576001)(24736002); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:CO1PR05MB441; H:CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; CLIP:66.129.232.2; FPR:; RD:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1; LANG:en;
Received: from mail220-co9 (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail220-co9 (MessageSwitch) id 1381630010253315_13970; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from CO9EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (unknown [10.236.132.234]) by mail220-co9.bigfish.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E90980040; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:50 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (157.56.240.101) by CO9EHSMHS014.bigfish.com (10.236.130.24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.227.3; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:49 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB441.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.147) by BL2PRD0510HT002.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.255.100.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.16.371.2; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:48 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.146) by CO1PR05MB441.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.73.147) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.785.10; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:45 +0000
Received: from CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.14]) by CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([169.254.13.50]) with mapi id 15.00.0785.001; Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:45 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
Subject: RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Topic: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain-08.txt> (Implications of Oversized IPv6 Header Chains) to Proposed Standard
Thread-Index: AQHOxlz+2A8NgSbtr0yOE+fNSkVMX5nvonIAgAAYo4CAAC5BAIAAAfUAgAAuLACAAcruIA==
Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:06:44 +0000
Message-ID: <f0df0113f68045a1bdadf0155eae5e34@CO1PR05MB442.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20131002185522.20697.96027.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831811BDD3@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <9300F272-E282-41C3-9DA8-59134B975FC7@employees.org> <9e33a47bb2834c15ba4269ae8c79c46f@BLUPR05MB433.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831811EB23@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <D1F5CE61-253E-4F07-AED1-4A4AB4C4AB68@employees.org> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831811EE66@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <E29381FD-C839-4DBA-8711-3A4EBA83E379@employees.org> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831811EF1C@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5255D6EE.4050300@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831811F688@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <5257AD5E.9090806@globis.net> <5257B870.1060003@si6networks.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831812C120@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <52582F8B.8040306@si6networks.com> <52585658.50205@gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D9831812C654@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <52587EB8.4020506@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <52587EB8.4020506@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.232.2]
x-forefront-prvs: 0998671D02
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-FOPE-CONNECTOR: Id%0$Dn%*$RO%0$TLS%0$FQDN%$TlsDn%
Cc: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, 6man Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2013 02:07:12 -0000

+1

Is there a way to decouple this discussion from draft-ietf-6man-oversized-header-chain? I would be glad to discuss it in the context of a separate draft.

                                                             Ron


> >
> > So, it wasn't necessarily the case that 1280 was a product of
> > "thoughtful analysis" so much as the fact that **they were rushing to
> > get a spec out the door**. So now, 16 years later, we get to put it
> > back on the 6man charter milestone list.
> 
> We could have that discussion in 6man, sure, but I don't believe that
> it's relevant to the question of whether draft-ietf-6man-oversized-
> header-chain
> is ready. This draft mitigates a known problem in terms of the current
> IPv6 standards.
>

v2.35.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status