Re: privacy at layer 7 and above

Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si> Fri, 15 February 2019 12:11 UTC

Return-Path: <jan@go6.si>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A258130E73 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:11:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=go6.si
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EhB-PIccoBZY for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:11:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.go6lab.si (mx.go6lab.si [91.239.96.23]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E26C124408 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 04:11:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mx.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F8E66077 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:11:08 +0100 (CET)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at go6.si
Received: from mx.go6lab.si ([IPv6:::1]) by localhost (mx.go6lab.si [IPv6:::1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 7GSlGl6ogfXq for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:11:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.go6.si (mail.go6.si [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4::61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.go6.si", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (not verified)) by mx.go6lab.si (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A71FA65E65 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:11:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from ISOC-BMDKQ4.local (unknown [IPv6:2001:67c:27e4:102:182a:e622:682:93c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Jan Zorz", Issuer "COMODO RSA Client Authentication and Secure Email CA" (not verified)) (Authenticated sender: jan) by mail.go6.si (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5B57F807BC for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:11:06 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=go6.si; s=mail; t=1550232666; bh=8N/9Yes3dsqlc0yadcRsC/LsEe6geAtEUrfttykdblA=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=U6AgL1M6Z3qKWM/IqwAgC6d2ilxw5cD5w5wss4viMWqbwX/VvqN38yAvFz2+ebAqJ 7csVW1+4Sg+0yxeQp5et8zhkfSMITj+sYparhOedkgUoV3YoRHEKiGJvRj5Fo7l3kt mOQYA0bkYhgCPcJJFnx3JfujGY+o/509r/rgzAYE=
Subject: Re: privacy at layer 7 and above
To: ipv6@ietf.org
References: <60fabe4b-fd76-4b35-08d3-09adce43dd71@si6networks.com> <c16e0e1f-1ed2-ad88-80f1-070bdd8bccca@go6.si> <1F2C2AEE-1C7D-481C-BBA7-7E507312C53A@employees.org> <e56a6e5b-648d-200e-c35d-97f15a31fb2a@asgard.org> <CAO42Z2zh7fKAgQJq9aLCTiFoSSsTeGM=pK3gXitg+gcxH=9fhQ@mail.gmail.com> <d38857c2-6e92-91d6-bb5d-d3eeeb61276a@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2yb47OyXk__Sz-kO00pfcBJgLAhff5DF=mpAddR0iCnAA@mail.gmail.com> <2612280f-195a-ae7a-b3b1-9022d9282fa7@foobar.org> <56F813F4-C512-40A9-8A68-1090C76A80F6@consulintel.es> <CAHL_VyCN8kU7qnLOphfGR25-xGBe_p6WeGTkKVXwU5uy5aJ8Dg@mail.gmail.com> <65DB4854-97D2-4C31-A691-2CD93812EF93@consulintel.es> <CAHL_VyCMpCcGkEQu+RV1GRf2QLB-HD0+AOOBV0YhfQ5sbydVzQ@mail.gmail.com> <8CE7A0CD-97D9-46A0-814D-CAF8788F9964@consulintel.es> <e3e0bf2273e04f15b792665d0f66dfe5@boeing.com> <4c5fab33-2bff-e5b5-fc1d-8f60a01a146d@go6.si> <b4525832-9151-20bf-7136-31d87ba6c88d@huitema.net> <463f15cf-2754-e2e8-609d-dc0f33448c6c@go6.si> <5519271a-fce7-ed75-d7b1-a360e34bb47a@gmail.com>
From: Jan Zorz - Go6 <jan@go6.si>
Message-ID: <2a235b2b-157d-2007-a82b-f120db097d72@go6.si>
Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:11:05 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.14; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <5519271a-fce7-ed75-d7b1-a360e34bb47a@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/LH2o0ZHFDoaQkvqRATmO4ibu1Nc>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:11:18 -0000

On 15/02/2019 10:53, Alexandre Petrescu wrote:
> Le 15/02/2019 à 10:30, Jan Zorz - Go6 a écrit : [...]
> 
>> /64 for each device is fine. What I'm questioning is if we really
>> need to make underlying to be something that was never meant to be
>> if L7 and above is broken? I think L7 and above needs to be fixed
>> first and then changing of addresses in transport layer can have
>> any effect. Until then - let's transport packets in a way that
>> doesn't break often and make user grumpy.
>> 
>> To put "lipstick on a pig" is a rhetorical expression, but quite 
>> useful in our case :) :) :) >
> I do not know what putting lipstick on a pig means, although I do 
> remember this expression being used by or in relationship with a 
> politician.

Some politicians used this term, bit it's not tied to tehm :D

"To put "lipstick on a pig" is a rhetorical expression, used to convey 
the message that making superficial or cosmetic changes is a futile 
attempt to disguise the true nature of a product or person. "

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lipstick_on_a_pig

> This looks far from being a matter of using or not using stable IP 
> addresses when querying a website.

It's a matter of other mechanisms tracking you independently of how 
often you change the IP address.

You can test some of this stuff here: https://panopticlick.eff.org/

Cheers, Jan