Re: RFC4941bis: consequences of many addresses for the network

[JORDI PALET MARTINEZ <[e-mail]>]

Not really, as I don't think is related to having more or less addresses. We have 2 ways to resolve that:
a) Make DHCPv6 mandatory, so people in those scenarios can force all the devices to use DHCPv6.
b) Make some way to SLAAC to "report" the addresses.
 
 

El 23/1/20 15:11, "ipv6 en nombre de Fernando Gont" <[e-mail] en nombre de [e-mail]> escribió:

    On 23/1/20 10:46, JORDI PALET MARTINEZ wrote:
    > Even not just debugging, but the operational complexity when in some
    > scenarios, certain apps need to "audit" which user did what. Using
    > DHCPv6 is not an option, because Android doesn't support it ... and I
    > will not recommend a customer to use "manual IPv6 configuration" :-(
    
    To the occasional reader or lurker, this might read as IPv6 folks 
    arguing that, after all, having too many addresses wasn't much of a good 
    idea (?) :-)
    
    Thanks,
    -- 
    Fernando Gont
    SI6 Networks
    e-mail: [e-mail]
    PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
    
    
    
    
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
    [e-mail]
    Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
    --------------------------------------------------------------------
    



**********************************************
IPv4 is over
Are you ready for the new Internet ?
http://www.theipv6company.com
The IPv6 Company

This electronic message contains information which may be privileged or confidential. The information is intended to be for the exclusive use of the individual(s) named above and further non-explicilty authorized disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited and will be considered a criminal offense. If you are not the intended recipient be aware that any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of the contents of this information, even if partially, including attached files, is strictly prohibited, will be considered a criminal offense, so you must reply to the original sender to inform about this communication and delete it.