Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Wed, 26 February 2020 18:22 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399DE3A1065; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6HGSYZRhCw7M; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg1-x535.google.com (mail-pg1-x535.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::535]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 863A73A1088; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg1-x535.google.com with SMTP id r77so51404pgr.12; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:22 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date:in-reply-to:cc:to :references; bh=MJBxOyS09BT8fgHK6xpYsPaXXPYodwmy2OU9xAOGR9U=; b=GpdGFe3VpWHYEutFHOCtSVsqZ6MFjcUg0XzhAiYISKFQsMHkDa8MH4rvNeywYh4JJN NvcJKfSq+NWB/V7c3AVV9UTj18thSbpmdbYpOPz2dwL7Bd9gt0PHmaWa7QZscqFaoUxq 7ySYVTPO/06Y0vkRZxf3x6btL6Ou9ja9W0F06kbbmmxOCBrR+8dN2g/Ss7HqAr9ST16R hJ1mdhpvKhknzc7gQp9IDTUbAaXazgFdf1uXukH/vu6AKU4rfpVjWZUnkUTOSUZQ6e63 5rWm+UpQjLepsn1FxztzT5ycC7/7wINTtiucKOlrb9Fmb4g57yt9E+Kx4IVdWI5/AhbQ cXKw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:date :in-reply-to:cc:to:references; bh=MJBxOyS09BT8fgHK6xpYsPaXXPYodwmy2OU9xAOGR9U=; b=EPIZHWO+TGWxmaNAdQiMaykCZ9nn7aqngRZPIhoh1EHok665IbTe1OxgbAVaU7Suzh OUtllZKln8VX/81+uwpelugCno6Pa4hCV1sEiZbxvo2lCS9b7wT3yEnLkeG4pAY8Y5Du y9ZWbi1mOWqSTlwAhFHqujmew14oj2zTS4JA3NI+8ityy13CMUAhy7q/B79uHizhE1jK uhCyrq9IpSPQqotCyM8QZKbqLkWUqQ2XS7kElQCuFt231sL1JD1Bf4Sb+pWsRRfMB5SI f/34ult8obb5uVg0EUZSOl7pm+wGBYFkD6FgWzpoZPc8zsYRDTsb6DPVCE5fbNlvQl5y vMPA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAU9LbSgwLjcv/TMXchtVslEpe9OM2122aCbPyl0af6/J+b4SN9z Iu2g2jLEHi3npY3IH9qwxd8=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwTt679ElDHXQx/V3JFP90MVqNVsLiVXOcbfSUJ7g3mzkQ4ccABr/N3yMQ8xaTfML5U5yetrA==
X-Received: by 2002:a62:f247:: with SMTP id y7mr5545671pfl.5.1582741341818; Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.52.15.12] (rrcs-67-52-140-11.west.biz.rr.com. [67.52.140.11]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y23sm3855379pfn.101.2020.02.26.10.22.20 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:21 -0800 (PST)
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Message-Id: <F88E3F76-DD4B-4807-A458-85FABFF20D96@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_2FA0E49B-8B8F-407C-975F-0AFB8DCFC7FE"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha512
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Subject: Re: [spring] Request to close the LC and move forward//RE: WGLC - draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 10:22:19 -0800
In-Reply-To: <55795690-EB0D-45F1-8483-675B061C6739@cisco.com>
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, SPRING WG List <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
To: "Zafar Ali (zali)" <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <55795690-EB0D-45F1-8483-675B061C6739@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MJ13C_fixgGEJ2l3A6D1A5IpyPA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2020 18:22:25 -0000

Zafar,

> On Feb 26, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Zafar Ali (zali) <zali=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> +1,
> 
> Just to add, in the spirit of IETF https://www.ietf.org/how/runningcode/ …
> implementation, commercial deployment and Inter-op status has been documented in https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-matsushima-spring-srv6-deployment-status/

I think the proper question is there a consensus to advance this document.

There seems to be questions about its relationship with RFC8200.  I am not seeing this as being resolved.

Bob