Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)

Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com> Mon, 13 November 2017 13:22 UTC

Return-Path: <victor@jvknet.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFC3129577 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22qf_OZt4GNk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-oi0-x242.google.com (mail-oi0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31E3F129584 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-oi0-x242.google.com with SMTP id r128so11204621oig.9 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jvknet-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=jozUr/WTaOOW4h2uB0Oes2FFmDXnoth01Z934RBHJCU=; b=zYtD0nkcPq+mQZ6XhmpjoDS6f+gD3WlTy2dfAqV50vVjUE87fL9ErAWr3w8HjCItmf +TBbW3dM8BEO30v0rrynRW7lBgwC7sBDGfbRUB9Bm2X7n1hOCiUTPN9KKYyMF0oHNOou EScloqYRq9RvUUWi4wkn4Zk7b7kBmKMcfD8F70HLTrBTCFpImEmmsxUEckM457iLhBV4 2qCugt3v1WQRcBWUTHu6JpQtJJ8t5jBzhm6MeRWzoMw+hOUBhooUdVO8maisFyAQS8eT QdH9+9EYnvQkQRdDdKUP8MmsiwZLXF4B7mtxqhNFBN+VYMstdQlYw5+M9D3lxncxRg0b 0U2A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=jozUr/WTaOOW4h2uB0Oes2FFmDXnoth01Z934RBHJCU=; b=t/84Wtr5iTzwqZUgailrDHyU7dEZPE60vgV+ffffvCjcZyGSpihO/2iZBeFBHWy6YB 1v9RslczF55lVHUdhl4Lscy66bW6A4vBcTUn7Z/sZ6saPRuyYZJHywOoVKVjH2wr7JbX qLX1HjyTrLklpKEBCHlB23F5oM3459ugGMHvjkbQDKsoKxy2p1SG7i8+DT9bDQvGDKCu pJlZJz1Lggp6n3zyjiBsvgLWjWJRcvHV+K+Y8FgFt2wfMubG+8xcYMyTCnqJ/ydtc9s4 fCyILFlMnmrAtTduagtQM36YnhjLoOLXEArqwgt19CUOJdekfqc1aaKfIhX89bbUwXfU cB8A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJaThX7Al+xd7bQrhnNswWPmm+xvYjs7q9dbumI35guEhySBFbfjHGjU 15Gwc1KgCsZaH5eTQFT4t1Okl0cfOuBVMgzEFj5AOQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGs4zMblNJZTrEXil29aU4BIprSxJUEsKjgtBMs4Tc7HLexymhkQlgq90UswPQvfqtdl7PDq1IlOJDAwFavG0lv60p0=
X-Received: by 10.202.75.139 with SMTP id y133mr5510793oia.117.1510579331476; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.157.13.74 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Nov 2017 05:22:10 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4b7e8e53-ea7a-f84d-92cf-a9a113c200ce@si6networks.com>
References: <be9724f5-2ff5-d90c-2749-ecae2c628b78@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr0_a2Qm8U4oK+BQU57DeDUD9i-o_+G+YhnH4pVXRxmxxQ@mail.gmail.com> <9d154133-a1de-7774-1589-c7069bf279ee@si6networks.com> <0b45890d-ea4a-47b8-a650-ceb72b066df8@gmail.com> <ea772bfd-4004-7f94-8469-b50e3aff0f29@si6networks.com> <F2330138-6842-4C38-B5A0-FB40BFACD038@employees.org> <e40697ca-8017-c9d2-c25d-89087046c9cf@gmail.com> <207f040a-7fe2-9434-e7a5-f546b26fdf63@strayalpha.com> <CAKD1Yr26NK2osApYZBm8Yd=0X7xcetrxojp6=JHOEAu9BB0q8A@mail.gmail.com> <8ca59610-2d25-2be4-9d2c-9b1a75fd3ace@si6networks.com> <E67105A3-396B-403C-B741-E9E01CFB5CE7@employees.org> <e7ec4633-8d45-1cff-ce37-48dafd488e13@si6networks.com> <BBAB48C0-384B-4380-9359-7965C7C61D58@employees.org> <4b7e8e53-ea7a-f84d-92cf-a9a113c200ce@si6networks.com>
From: Victor Kuarsingh <victor@jvknet.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 08:22:10 -0500
Message-ID: <CAJc3aaPZ2dxJ7JSz07wEE6TCqwRyGv=wSQmQ3Wci-L_3uix9_w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Stateful SLAAC (draft-ietf-v6ops-unique-ipv6-prefix-per-host)
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Cc: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MVHvKXUL7xZ8oYorQSSwlKSiVp4>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2017 13:22:23 -0000

On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 4:21 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>; wrote:
> On 11/13/2017 11:07 AM, Ole Troan wrote:

>
> If the implementation approach is as you've described, this is outside
> of the SLAAC specification, indeed (nobody can prevent you from spawning
> instances of SLAAC that behave according to the existing standards).
> >From a operational point of view, one would wonder why pursue this path
> as opposed to e.g. do DHCPv6 -- even if that means: we want to support
> Android, and Android does not support DHCPv6.

My understanding is one of the authors is an operator and the model
represents operational experience and input on this.

regards,

Victor K