IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>

Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 16 April 2018 13:31 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C6312D870 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5yG9VvzGlKc8 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com [208.84.65.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D66831243F3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108159.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w3GDTbYa023601; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:16 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=eQXPk2p1USWE/DCQKY6VMcbn2b8kOoZOUZPYvk/Pugw=; b=rJNpY40PHj/GYslcA81+F1sYNPTSw8vY4rh/UljA+aIFCY7iPFue+S2+FWSznUQLX1wJ AgKsoy02LCBTS7W1xY9J4aJaaMgwmiC3sCvL6Uwn6uiBPvjqb4UpD+IP5nyXij19wykO EcTyRAJA+AVZzmxUVZCQalZsnHotjDQckMuSxEjB8YaNncLG6xFjDPmr7/Dgwo8E0T8V +3LWNBUsK8xbYhM/3KgDAAygzngc5omiZokYBlrNCvs7G/Zj5GQ8wbIB9M8u9P7OASQI zLZUjwoFkCv0D6mNhtXT+1vtbocory3yv7E+UxoNWoJVwIW86kyTgzq3X69fonLQ2QpV dA==
Received: from nam01-bn3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn3nam01lp0176.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.176]) by mx0a-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2hcm3q0rbq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 16 Apr 2018 06:31:15 -0700
Received: from SN6PR05MB4240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.67.146) by SN6PR05MB4191.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.67.20) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.696.7; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:31:13 +0000
Received: from SN6PR05MB4240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59a2:13ab:6110:35af]) by SN6PR05MB4240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::59a2:13ab:6110:35af%13]) with mapi id 15.20.0696.011; Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:31:13 +0000
From: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>
Thread-Topic: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt>
Thread-Index: AQHTx5zaEut14AfnNkml+3dwg8ha1aQDfMSA
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:31:13 +0000
Message-ID: <SN6PR05MB4240109BD0CEA1C9B10335DEAEB00@SN6PR05MB4240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20160428004904.25189.43047.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <FB1C6E49-81F7-49DD-8E8B-2C0C4735071B@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <FB1C6E49-81F7-49DD-8E8B-2C0C4735071B@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.14]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; SN6PR05MB4191; 7:w8WvYn3/drP49c77mxO5EG6jtR2ULw71/0dyLIi2dYnYqEvVeQeT0dTcRaG6ev6P7hmHKA8zojkZ/ORAVYJN6AUavKtH8wAV5nZNvMfob2LZ9jcS0DQPHkDwBD7nRmH+3QRbgAPE5j1SXyfKjmPyBDVqCcBhC+4bKGL5KNxQoikMcSmkFtb8SXvVkCGlIB7NswBGQ+50J42NlDHCybG+frjhfvAV9mfy4ahSfDOM5P+8cX7Q+OJffdeyilXFq/Cx
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(48565401081)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:SN6PR05MB4191;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: SN6PR05MB4191:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <SN6PR05MB41918B947F3058495DF55E0EAEB00@SN6PR05MB4191.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(85827821059158);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3231232)(944501327)(52105095)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123560045)(20161123558120)(20161123564045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:SN6PR05MB4191; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:SN6PR05MB4191;
x-forefront-prvs: 0644578634
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(376002)(366004)(39860400002)(39380400002)(346002)(396003)(377424004)(189003)(199004)(13464003)(55016002)(7696005)(99286004)(110136005)(5250100002)(39060400002)(3846002)(6116002)(9686003)(53936002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(5660300001)(74316002)(478600001)(966005)(305945005)(66066001)(6246003)(86362001)(6436002)(76176011)(7736002)(97736004)(229853002)(4743002)(102836004)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(11346002)(2900100001)(68736007)(446003)(59450400001)(2906002)(53546011)(6506007)(14454004)(476003)(186003)(26005)(316002)(486006)(8936002)(106356001)(33656002)(105586002)(25786009)(6306002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:SN6PR05MB4191; H:SN6PR05MB4240.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: PH5jb1fKKQbrwiVk1v/nEsFH77CBiKkV55iFcXMr45yBbR5Ajtjoyaft3WjF4WBmpcZCXnMBrXaPmNAd3/oyxLxgbF6BQw2MyNjWb/xV2Qd2PnOmnoyhIe59nuFh4MrJDKT3hjWGm883HN1Dk+ES0HkrO28pkfOJ8WLa/v+Q1VamHbsDNIX4TbrfUHt/GEj8
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: e0b577d1-95cc-49fc-0f22-08d5a39e52ee
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: e0b577d1-95cc-49fc-0f22-08d5a39e52ee
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 16 Apr 2018 13:31:13.3974 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: SN6PR05MB4191
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-04-16_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1804160129
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/MbjzXALPzAA57HLhfTf9yLOyLpE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 13:31:19 -0000

Folks,

Before the last call ends, I would like to add two more comments:

1) The given that:

- the semantic of a SID is different from the semantic of an IPv6 Address,
- and that a SID can be copied into the Destination Address Field of IP Header
- and that the Destination Address Field of an IP Header can carry a SID, even if the packet does not contain an SRH

The document should consider the degree to which it extends the IPv6 Addressing Architecture. This discussion should include both topological instructions and service-based instructions.

2) In order to reduce the degree to which SRv6 extends the IPv6 Addressing Architecture, the document should represent service-based instructions as Destination Options

                                                                    Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Bob Hinden
> Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2018 4:31 PM
> To: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
> Subject: 6man w.g. last call for <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-
> 11.txt>
> 
> 
> This message starts a two week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on advancing:
> 
>        Title           : IPv6 Segment Routing Header (SRH)
>        Authors         : Stefano Previdi
>                          Clarence Filsfils
>                          John Leddy
>                          Satoru Matsushima
>                          Daniel Voyer
> 	Filename       : draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header-11.txt
> 	Pages          : 34
> 	Date           : 2018-03-28
> 
>      https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header
> 
> as a Proposed Standard.  Substantive comments and statements of support
> for publishing this document should be directed to the mailing list.
> Editorial suggestions can be sent to the author.  This last call will end on 12
> April 2018.
> 
> An issue tracker will be setup to track issues raised on this document.
> 
> Thanks,
> Bob & Ole
> 
> 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email