IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate

Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au> Fri, 28 June 2013 00:00 UTC

Return-Path: <kauer@biplane.com.au>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0563B11E8149 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Jxn2b2ik4KFj for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:00:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE911E8142 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 27 Jun 2013 17:00:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoEDAKfQzFGWZX+7/2dsb2JhbAANToM6Q78JAQMBAwGBGIMXAQEBAQOBCQsYLlcZiBWpF5Ipj1wWg08DiGqQBIp6iEU
Received: from eth4284.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.203]) ([150.101.127.187]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 28 Jun 2013 09:30:14 +0930
Message-ID: <1372377611.3215.141.camel@karl>
Subject: Re: draft-bonica-6man-frag-deprecate
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 10:00:11 +1000
In-Reply-To: <20130627233130.345EB36613EA@drugs.dv.isc.org>
References: <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85151@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C32FA9.1090207@gmail.com> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F85F38@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20130624204008.GB3647@virgo.local> <20130624205226.GC3647@virgo.local> <2CF4CB03E2AA464BA0982EC92A02CE2509F8761C@BY2PRD0512MB653.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <51C902DC.9000408@gmail.com> <m24ncmaozs.wl%randy@psg.com> <2EA20F89-02F5-4D06-90EE-A7D2974045A3@employees.org> <m2li5yj7u3.wl%randy@psg.com> <8C48B86A895913448548E6D15DA7553B9268E3@xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com> <m2ehbpij86.wl%randy@psg.com> <51CB91E4.5090603@gmail.com> <CADoTVZLe=dm+JhMSAxFiAYpUMG=T-cUFdtkdHtmzmebG9=Dujw@mail.gmail.com> <2134F8430051B64F815C691A62D983180AECDE@XCH-BLV-504.nw.nos.boeing.com> <CADoTVZLEKt1FdB+UadvAM6AeVZ3Weacm+0o74F9aYqxmrisBqg@mail.gmail.com> <00de01ce7385$15428a50$3fc79ef0$@tndh.net> <20130627233130.345EB36613EA@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
X-Mailer: Evolution 3.2.3-0ubuntu6
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 00:00:36 -0000

On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 09:31 +1000, Mark Andrews wrote:
> Then add a cryptographic checksum of the original packet when fragmenting.
> 48 bits in a HBH should be enough.

Why HBH? Is that to prevent it being send in a fragment itself? And, um,
I hate to suggest this, but isn't that sort of exactly what the AH
header is for? I know, I know.... (covers head, ducks)

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer
http://twitter.com/kauer389

GPG fingerprint: B862 FB15 FE96 4961 BC62 1A40 6239 1208 9865 5F9A
Old fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email