IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: MLD snooping of solicted-node multicast (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-halpern-6man-nd-pre-resolve-addr-00.txt

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Fri, 17 January 2014 19:02 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC631AE169 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:17 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.916
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.916 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Uc94hJCxjhsw for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-ie0-x236.google.com (mail-ie0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::236]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4A31AD939 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id as1so6036917iec.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=uzLMQ4sgLzN0JyHMXWyDz8KRaUtSijKCeQeBhQtXXh0=; b=bQtw5bZSWhJpEyLDXc+6az/jUpC1qA9ghLF+5scBG17SkxnFmQsiwFjclZOrth0ICr +zxnJXrrHO/fsmzFzOB+lITaQkIf572IOpHaZ+/GPK+iXkSoGGm69Dw1+pBSG9/Tr6Ff K0ZyfT7Q+soc6SpxS3suTHgNkX9BZDVFaq+u1kM5vs7R1/sP2Q+r+PCYqETNZUZikozW b+gr0jThqPxGaesOvB9z0fJTstdJsF3jX4L3zExQiqdSuSPywm6UrluDQZhuG3s9gphb RZYcpCXnu2rLuMkpRPIayW6wMy7vEjCsJDU+Jyo2LKtIyvAwPu69AvwNuDHskqqTnEQu /m6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=uzLMQ4sgLzN0JyHMXWyDz8KRaUtSijKCeQeBhQtXXh0=; b=kFEx6lWOGuzsLpPDDDdtjMWezaI49wmuOkgP6K3AW+0me0jAnNi4ve6idvWZvTGdBL DHXyAdzXxvQpUVNTV4w36Zgkv148D643NlSm6+a/wE1v66ro2rz874ZI7YtKbxFfSBX9 5Qg3CkQQhvYkben3p03qfBAi+OtITxFmir6g6YbTyoVTPtYg0oRkXyYjoqoPvTwKA3Nz zvYhyDXIe4EHJuOiyFFSPnVd/4IrnG5TT3h4IXpo7e+Iey9houmeDkV+1ZC1lnd+abHm +8t5xJQ9UanXUvn2okdFt7gfTCrkNT/mK5UIypeb+s04KZfc1SWsS1uuhIFPuyG12Axq zKtQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlRZ1Mlus8r5HEVuq8sD6/QFn3dHmEOlDqurAePgzX2S9wbaa2Fm+XsgF1LqgIVmbrTUf0/I20RHqljERWpr2n7oWhkCUDqiskfAVJd5/Mte/gwrMWpcgYx/t6Lqywu3Se/GhXnARPKa2XosqaywLhsZ+oK3SnLad16uc/m4uA3AtAdGy42UcoO0DXhIC/Wz8Lru0VH
X-Received: by 10.43.103.67 with SMTP id dh3mr3261891icc.60.1389985322282; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:02:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.7.36 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:01:42 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <2c30d818adc447b2a0ca3a7f0556ee65@SN2PR03MB077.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
References: <20140111004402.10451.90724.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <BF6E0BD839774345977891C597F8B50C5CE74C@eusaamb109.ericsson.se> <72381AF1F18BAE4F890A0813768D992817FCA84E@sdcexchms.au.logicalis.com> <892FB91E-311D-4A50-A38B-4972F70847AB@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr2CLUmTYTNAj2_bkP=f3xeBCZ2g=9Sr0D-GvtRgxmfC3g@mail.gmail.com> <2c30d818adc447b2a0ca3a7f0556ee65@SN2PR03MB077.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 11:01:42 -0800
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1kZ74DWnzFMxfm=NGxxGG8uKVTD3oA4xSay5LPpCdf6w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MLD snooping of solicted-node multicast (Was: Re: New Version Notification for draft-halpern-6man-nd-pre-resolve-addr-00.txt
To: Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec517201f60d65d04f02f2d6a"
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ing-Wher Chen <ing-wher.chen@ericsson.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 19:02:17 -0000

On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:39 AM, Dmitry Anipko <Dmitry.Anipko@microsoft.com
> wrote:

>  >> There are basically two solicited-node groups per host
>
>
>
> Does this assume that typically there are only 2 non link-local IPv6
> addresses  per host? (since different addresses are unlikely to fall in the
> same group, as long as they have different interface identifiers)
>

A more precise statement would be that the number of solicited-node groups
scales linearly with the number of IPv6 addresses assigned to hosts, which
is something that people don't usually seem to worry about.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email