Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 22 February 2017 17:46 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BB7129503 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5UbR3xC2GwDV for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-vk0-x233.google.com (mail-vk0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B5B71299F9 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-vk0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t8so6082023vke.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:47 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=MsMeQRoSZvZ8ehhWYm+iVc4g4H7f93yeIXgcnk2XPlc=; b=fH7tc3SdOcbcY5qiRyBAKJ/aUGusEXHM2aUADHLThVGXLM12eBbcuAoe+EU7UF8yIq VLhK5WXK8abd1DCbBHM0x/9OjhoMOjZXLFFQPBR2pFVXoiJ3UP7EK9J426GyF18WGSxt WTsN0JFM8YEJaZpLmXstyRGW8ahGQzLuVyQ5+uSsImdxLxQVWBVaLyugmGXgbG3OPtJO qdkG6+TPXsd0eP50PFQKO8jiverDjDyifuM+byn0VxMIpUOdUnl/W1UpCM1JKh9QjvG5 ZUzHXuawGUgcnzjOs0sWJLKm964dBHjUALMimVDJ1naWm0a6XraJX6Y1zDdxaoNJNxpx 82XA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=MsMeQRoSZvZ8ehhWYm+iVc4g4H7f93yeIXgcnk2XPlc=; b=mPxZAaWDZigFRGYzCWHXFbRKfatKak7C7Vo7X0u7K2A2SqSFqw3jwkRYXa7jmFUyMl dA927Ed6M1lwT9SoVaoUYW4Ph/D9Nr6bUET80cIdjOY1jJ8c8AR9sZ1aYAE+sXzt3qGl NtNlc4b/1O/SGsoFHnn8dh1/WWsfGZ6LgXH3Zh62xmPguynC0FBy6P2tKZrN95oVJ6Wr 90AUTy9uYHTIe4dbbVQyhbzx5dsYxWKD7HgyXRt/W+AqBtomzaXpuGvJOQmZdj4uBSyZ iAZhmThmZ9QOMJ3EOJ6SqakIuXJRDmcItqXbOGLWaq+FuGFO95/X04hd0tOqk/sEfoTV Jt0w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n5Ir36I2Kt6AubKDI2PuSmvKCfNpmjebqGjcqp0AfsSFshl+YDjnLDkRhfeu6yquoXffs+s/oAndpc3bGn
X-Received: by 10.31.170.15 with SMTP id t15mr14310465vke.6.1487785606365; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:46 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.31.171.2 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Feb 2017 09:46:25 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2yK_rZksa4xQkuW8Q_hwaitH610m6kVBmFisN7toaSoPw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <m2lgt6ed7j.wl-randy@psg.com> <4514E052-25C1-4C85-AB1D-0B53FD9DA0E1@employees.org> <CAN-Dau3VriYNUf96yZEFMMV+-4WCxBz94Lkqfg3OsCUAbVYhaw@mail.gmail.com> <660929B4-158B-453F-9B5F-6C029F9699FA@employees.org> <E093E86F-41F5-4485-A8D3-761831F9AAF8@google.com> <ECF27195-4A6B-4AFC-8950-83876F333BD4@employees.org> <20170220235734.GA84656@Vurt.local> <CAKD1Yr3p=8b9Dmmb9GvGMq1u00xnE2ScmaF_a3FJXiteL=ZhBQ@mail.gmail.com> <20170221172739.GT84656@Vurt.local> <CAO42Z2xEqnz4=E7JDOA_FCg_RxkMuZgnBc3KuaxwY1oZryed9g@mail.gmail.com> <20170221202821.GB32367@Vurt.local> <CAO42Z2yK_rZksa4xQkuW8Q_hwaitH610m6kVBmFisN7toaSoPw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2017 02:46:25 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr3pNBCNFRkZiDYoOp7CDDG-4pbuzkLW8UeJB_bbS7QEWw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis-07.txt> (IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture) to Internet Standard
To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1143225092201d0549221482
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/NXkiy7ZrlSifDlkSTKmykjXJ0NM>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-rfc4291bis@ietf.org, IETF <ietf@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 17:46:49 -0000

On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 2:42 AM, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>; wrote:

> Let's leave behind unnecessary practices that have been used to extend
> IPv4's life, and that make things unnecessarily complicated and more costly
> to operate and troubleshoot.
>

What he said.