Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis
Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com> Thu, 16 June 2022 07:21 UTC
Return-Path: <furry13@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F12FC15AAF6; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:21:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.858
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.858 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hiwk33WenhLs; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42c.google.com (mail-pf1-x42c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBCFCC15AAF4; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42c.google.com with SMTP id e11so741397pfj.5; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:21:50 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=X12yRVnkVV/u5q0kjOLZn7M8CkzDTQmSdXHokvqbyn0=; b=OLxu2NWOkT2aVo3WKYxGu5IoHWx7gr7tbl43k6kkkz94xxhRQVWJffEcFQ7EkrCh/O b8q/lsqtJk6hu3AQ/EiPB1u/VOIT3LuOORT4T/AyW4fJ9Q3jfF/GKrJhk6O4i/mGzS55 nNIyhm+bU2hzNJ37saDG/wle/mk2PrGsbkeLKuHMGbnaIcrsG1/9DZJjVrQ5VnedfwXh z9d6zX+Ksty5/cvygckE34ZHUZGubcPISLNw/A2oNMvhHKun2Zfj4GmRFfzmo3K5jYOG SrsS08G2FU21G8/dQeFrizRGsiyIAfBHjiFih3yns9PLbuitSvrlL3uQiPj9UQYjDQA9 yy1Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=X12yRVnkVV/u5q0kjOLZn7M8CkzDTQmSdXHokvqbyn0=; b=refdTssfTAePP09uDO8SdZgtFxVlTUulA1TmVw2A9MqOY7Ylw+XTomSwIz+gqiPXNB Y6th9lJzrypPJQRmcS1NKVzRysXCpg65YWBb0kxdFJ/K9xyFLzJp30cP9vyiRGuL1wEB 4RrtOdZJSWxft9i327fvidnqUA2qqb0ndXwqcjb2shDQVLzGfU9FdMykuyhtM2inWRiS yGctz5jB7/qKLplCj1mzzmz9wrfxm57VliXJXDvIcu17HMppZ/Cq1aUneXjcaGwxx6+8 TR/J8UBRKO4mcrqyZIPVwwG0whGbMrUSZwgry4aUs50etyo50tiFw+LXMvW13SxJbwXl 55hw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora/taCGk80BXvqL+EZ3ec1QWX5WuOW8XR/keZc6XXsH68sRJgggK kvDOMVSUiLBpcvR7bJObSA9ZiK7l3HIMQ50KMOdSXVSz
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tZxjHdivn+WSnKAOa5GgyybkiFhn0eGMtPnPou4zPkYyzaa58RqC+tmVFyjrmGJ8ekir0tr6ky4oHRzi5lTLo=
X-Received: by 2002:a63:fb18:0:b0:408:b2c3:8dfd with SMTP id o24-20020a63fb18000000b00408b2c38dfdmr3210377pgh.448.1655364109993; Thu, 16 Jun 2022 00:21:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <164938402532.17740.11717866110301931501@ietfa.amsl.com> <b1780128-2069-b32e-7ca5-86977c119f0c@gmail.com> <11d4e419-11a9-8768-abf2-1335e5f1c3d8@gmail.com> <149924f9-da30-fa79-0509-c01c439d1796@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <149924f9-da30-fa79-0509-c01c439d1796@gmail.com>
From: Jen Linkova <furry13@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 17:21:38 +1000
Message-ID: <CAFU7BAQ1e3qQN93NazWBJzWvDCkT-FYjdO5BFwz6J_HxV-KmeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: 6man Chairs <6man-chairs@ietf.org>, 6man <ipv6@ietf.org>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Stuart Cheshire <cheshire@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Ncf5g1yUu5tk1bRUJMqFfUGVm3U>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 07:21:55 -0000
Hi Brian, Sorry for the delay. I've just updated the document status in the datatracker and announced the WG LC (till July 1st). On Sat, Jun 11, 2022 at 11:57 AM Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote: > > Dear 6man-chairs (especially Jen), > > The authors believe that this draft is now stable and we request a WG Last Call. It would be nice to get this done before the IETF meeting. > > Regards > Brian Carpenter > > On 19-May-22 12:52, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > > There's been no more discussion for several weeks. Can we move > > on to a WG Last Call? > > > > Regards > > Brian Carpenter > > On 08-Apr-22 14:29, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> This version reflects comments at the IETF and on the list. > >> Change log: > >> * Extended use cases (added Microsoft WSD) > >> * Clarified relationship with RFC3986 language > >> * Allow for legacy use of RFC6874 format > >> * Augmented security considerations > >> * Editorial and reference improvements > >> > >> Note that some of the text about RFC3986 that Shang Ye > >> suggested to remove has been retained, but modified. Further > >> comments about this, or any other aspect, are very welcome. > >> > >> Regards > >> Brian + co-authors > >> > >> On 08-Apr-22 14:13, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote: > >>> > >>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. > >>> This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance WG of the IETF. > >>> > >>> Title : Representing IPv6 Zone Identifiers in Address Literals and Uniform Resource Identifiers > >>> Authors : Brian Carpenter > >>> Stuart Cheshire > >>> Robert M. Hinden > >>> Filename : draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt > >>> Pages : 13 > >>> Date : 2022-04-07 > >>> > >>> Abstract: > >>> This document describes how the zone identifier of an IPv6 scoped > >>> address, defined as <zone_id> in the IPv6 Scoped Address Architecture > >>> (RFC 4007), can be represented in a literal IPv6 address and in a > >>> Uniform Resource Identifier that includes such a literal address. It > >>> updates the URI Generic Syntax and Internationalized Resource > >>> Identifier specifications (RFC 3986, RFC 3987) accordingly, and > >>> obsoletes RFC 6874. > >>> > >>> > >>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis/ > >>> > >>> There is also an HTML version available at: > >>> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.html > >>> > >>> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01 > >>> > >>> > >>> Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts > >>> > >>> > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> I-D-Announce mailing list > >>> I-D-Announce@ietf.org > >>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/i-d-announce > >>> Internet-Draft directories: http://www.ietf.org/shadow.html > >>> or ftp://ftp.ietf.org/ietf/1shadow-sites.txt > >>> -- SY, Jen Linkova aka Furry
- I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt internet-drafts
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt… tom petch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt… tom petch
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Brian E Carpenter
- Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Bob Hinden
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Jen Linkova
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Philipp S. Tiesel
- Re: Next step for draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis Brian E Carpenter
- Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ietf-6… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Ted Lemon
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Carsten Bormann
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Ted Lemon
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Carsten Bormann
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Brian Carpenter
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Ted Lemon
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Kerry Lynn
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Ted Lemon
- RE: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Vasilenko Eduard
- RE: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Ted Lemon
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Fernando Gont
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Fernando Gont
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Fernando Gont
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-rfc6874bis-01.txt Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Simon
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Michael Richardson
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Ted Lemon
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Michael Richardson
- Re: Scripting attacks [was Next step for draft-ie… Brian E Carpenter