Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis

"Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com> Fri, 18 March 2016 01:03 UTC

Return-Path: <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CE012D7A6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:03:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HK_NAME_FM_MR_MRS=1.499, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mCY_vypQyyE6 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F6412D5C5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g3so121911719ywa.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:03:25 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Zpgs8IlJlICaQoSmFjh4ZfAmdgGwnjse5f3uMFONer8=; b=sKtalMQCDab/fKXxKKYEOnu6mEhKw/nk9B2pYsZzGKbPgpLGkV5OrLlCTG2AGCWvN3 8nrXiafytvk4+rJbOSwx14NeFAQTFU9o+IoNSodzI4oaaHWs6rb1pTLmPNFDbh6ENk3C XlKxGGOJSY6IV1HQVhgOvnvj8igeY3obIDUv921TRFRHRPAQB1fF2HvXzRwNbbcIV3PK Ld5icewVhoPbRmdQ+Xo7FFu6G6ER9x7klkVzZa7ygZPRaFLVVdSYtzwgFQogiZv5TJ7K Bxafdj0o6K0fXNlILFTRly/ETTbvWfyCK+M/4m8suXyEpykRV7Bvzkkw7ft1wo9aOrIb D45Q==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Zpgs8IlJlICaQoSmFjh4ZfAmdgGwnjse5f3uMFONer8=; b=bpTxojhkY8cr0Ka+Knyav/tmqP+uen1Osus8rgvFu/usw+Ya0lF4/WBmb+KwHyVriS 50p4pinc7IYm8zNGAVwb3lhDgPxHuKnccPMLBOVgGF6DfGpB3lGa57bCr9Z4i5d9U/Yf cT6GtDZ534aicUa0Mcuhijx6tBf1NIVL5CWxL4TGBhBDvTDoiKwPeSlPY97xpqGvYlKm LyIEGq0a/OT4g12gAr4q57wlHcMi7ODyl2PVAAMIP37UXX7uLoNlqG6dj61MD6l6vXLi EMZlm1ASJ5subiCIa5fHw7sPHQ6BKHK9d2pl+l0MeFEpwOn4AGVDkTGRyAIaE6GvJBqG vpgA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLGH17trkFpU04bFGr4o6npxfhtKrqN5vYYRMLeDVShgcTjsLn/4/gAFzVL0ftXwoiFE4JdBbRHXMgqww==
X-Received: by 10.129.41.132 with SMTP id p126mr5466746ywp.341.1458263003677; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:03:23 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.129.83.87 with HTTP; Thu, 17 Mar 2016 18:02:54 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <56EADE87.1050304@si6networks.com>
References: <6AC58C26-01B6-4C16-851F-0C1228CDD2AF@employees.org> <CAPK2DewJ0uF9i_uaKLCn5gM_KGm2uv5B0a2VFm7cmNNn5acQPQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqcetbtgsje4TqCpUF+zoUL19RHjWj2-xg+N39i8XodDVQ@mail.gmail.com> <517ACBE4-46C3-40C7-86E5-5906309E6BA9@employees.org> <CAJE_bqfeLxURYwMDcjMtSnyb2WBeYu_5Yq_2Yyo_O9sqHRn+og@mail.gmail.com> <73EEC8CE-EDC8-45FC-AE4F-F390F965304F@employees.org> <CAPK2DezV9vKYrHCAJJ_bFQZa02MCJMPdX7=BtL-tPzOj+da6vQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqd316puXTvku3hMMGnThOV3JGMbLK_erQJDd6ic-BNJgA@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2DezfW5khZyW-2wNfZ04=BSV2xq57Z52WDCoeivt4J9tvig@mail.gmail.com> <CAJE_bqfLtPmFBqZXDCfnnxZHUvzQFbicV0dweS23VjL_oEbDVg@mail.gmail.com> <CAPK2Dew4AVuZ9ssQnwSfbGu7vfS1f__8tgNWk9WFhEep7wPdGA@mail.gmail.com> <56EA8D27.3060704@forthnet.gr> <CAPK2DeyT-K1LR3+dAuLiuS2L=xr7Q4e2N-QZAoWHRC_cQSFKzw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr142AT1UKfdQG4D9HaROJKKJN8Zj+ywj3sp9T-qNq7wNQ@mail.gmail.com> <56EAAD36.20901@si6networks.com> <CAKD1Yr1RH2r7H7Zq5y7ZRLx1v87jNWHy5n_eQDLWL9kfL7L2mg@mail.gmail.com> <56EADE87.1050304@si6networks.com>
From: "Mr. Jaehoon Paul Jeong" <jaehoon.paul@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 10:02:54 +0900
Message-ID: <CAPK2DewGU4sM4yqN-bgc7zQ77F_ednZ8X0-VyQRmD_aoZCgapA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: 6MAN Working group last call: draft-ietf-6man-rdnss-rfc6106bis
To: Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1140829652c9bf052e485012"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/NfLN4JRhSIkfAt9tzOwHVLIXzms>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 01:03:27 -0000

Fernando and Lorenzo,

I took a look at the draft of
https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-06.txt.

>From Case 4 (all RA flags are set, that is, M=1, A=1, O=1) in A.2.2,
Fedora 21 and Centos 7 let the DNS of the RAs have higher priority, but
MAC OS-X lets the DNS of DHCPv6 have higher priority.
In the current implementations, there is no consistency to handle RDNSS
options from RA and DHCPv6.

Thus, I suggest the following text with the preference for DHCPv6 because
there is no a stong rationale, but there must be somehow a guidance to
handle this case:

The DNS options from Router Advertisements and DHCP SHOULD be
stored into the DNS Repository and Resolver Repository so that
information from DHCP appears there first and therefore takes
precedence. This document recommends that the DNS information
from DHCP should have higher priority than that of RA for
DNS queries to handle the case of the coexistence of RA and DHCP.

If anyone does not object this text, I will revise the draft with it.

Thanks.

Paul

On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 1:42 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
wrote:

> On 03/17/2016 10:21 AM, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 10:12 PM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com
> > <mailto:fgont@si6networks.com>> wrote:
> >
> >     > I'm not even sure "IPv6 hosts usually prefer DHCP to RA for their
> >     > network configuration" is a true statement. Do we have data on
> that?
> >
> >     The v6ops draft that you don't like covers this one.
> >
> >
> > ... and the answer is....?
>
> Section A.2.2. (and probably others) of:
> https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem-06.txt
>
> --
> Fernando Gont
> SI6 Networks
> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>



-- 
===========================
Mr. Jaehoon (Paul) Jeong, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Software
Sungkyunkwan University
Office: +82-31-299-4957
Email: jaehoon.paul@gmail.com, pauljeong@skku.edu
Personal Homepage: http://iotlab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php
<http://cpslab.skku.edu/people-jaehoon-jeong.php>