RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?

"Voyer, Daniel" <> Thu, 28 May 2020 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70B43A0FC1 for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oTC6eSxTM-Zb for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F7693A0F34 for <>; Thu, 28 May 2020 09:05:21 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;;; q=dns/txt; s=ESAcorp; t=1590681921; x=1622217921; h=from:to:cc:date:message-id:mime-version:subject; bh=rxtOseVJ9CPXdK2cpXdyrLDzvWovxpZsT0oyQQu8jMs=; b=bnyYX2rw+SZwOzRmu1lg6m+0vvLXO30XPvnEX2aEwpJzvhM3K8/r+bXV WM0fxYUCZa1KVn4CnmhIOOrjcwBbeXQBz1t8daPTHiUSTCOmLGn4/EF5u JI3OpG/yqK2USx1kkICgpZG+Sc4tNFXgVF3WcHXHGG3n3FyCGTyvLXyln ww91gnAFHfxrWvMjL7lb2XINU8ljiu5xFmFmyAuvsmSQM6pVKs/BsQkfM eHZ2LZLxrEoELZGrUSC4qox/l/dav62vSBhQZy9Ant6RlLNX3bgRjpAV7 D2RTP+SFRQ3/4O+H5NvJBcYIjH5+/9xCoCpPFIHGRoN5tQ5aTii1RTCKj A==;
IronPort-SDR: k/tTOoiVK7z+rAsBv3n8fyZ/nAbOlItPQnCyimdsMm7BzG4u2VpYr0LsRJ15NBS7aWzik3fclb OXDV21xZTYvQ==
Subject: RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Received: from unknown (HELO ([]) by with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384; 28 May 2020 12:05:19 -0400
Received: from (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by (2002:8eb6:1222::8eb6:1222) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 28 May 2020 12:05:19 -0400
Received: from (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) by (2002:8eb6:120e::8eb6:120e) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1497.2; Thu, 28 May 2020 12:05:18 -0400
Received: from ([fe80::985f:63a7:1da1:aa02]) by ([fe80::985f:63a7:1da1:aa02%22]) with mapi id 15.00.1497.006; Thu, 28 May 2020 12:05:18 -0400
From: "Voyer, Daniel" <>
To: Andrew Alston <>, "Bernier, Daniel" <>, "Templin (US), Fred L" <>, "" <>, Mark Smith <>
CC: 6MAN <>
Thread-Topic: [EXT]RE: So where have all these new 6man WG people come from?
Thread-Index: AQHWNQnINtVIK0jhw0+EqR9Y3yyhFA==
Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:05:18 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/16.37.20051002
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2430A3B874CD4C08A5668468E7145CC0bellca_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 May 2020 16:05:23 -0000

Hello Andrew,

Am questioning if we are seeing a growth in participation – or a blatant stacking of the floor with people who have never set foot on the lists and will never will again.

Similar to the floor of +1’s we saw on something else a while back – where – once I took the list of all of them – and ran through an analytics script – had never posted to any archive I could find – and have never posted since.

DV - I tried to raise the point, earlier, that the exact same phenomenon happened in spring, literally copy/paste your lines for spring.
Obviously it shows that “something” is happening between these 2 working groups, now we should just go with it  or, well what are we going to do about it ?