IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses

Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au> Tue, 27 March 2012 10:40 UTC

Return-Path: <kauer@biplane.com.au>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44C1321E814E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:40:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_21=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GjuIjNTYMkan for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:4]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FDE321E8143 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Mar 2012 03:40:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApIBAPGXcU+WZX+7/2dsb2JhbAANN4VAthkBAQEEI2YLGCoCAlcZr1eSDY1rggyBGAShFYd0
Received: from eth4284.nsw.adsl.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.207]) ([150.101.127.187]) by ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 27 Mar 2012 21:10:55 +1030
Subject: Re: 3484bis and privacy addresses
From: Karl Auer <kauer@biplane.com.au>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
References: <4F716D5C.40402@innovationslab.net>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UZzI3c+7OF8bep1NWitY"
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 21:40:49 +1100
Message-ID: <1332844849.2641.800.camel@karl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2012 10:40:56 -0000

On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 03:33 -0400, Brian Haberman wrote:
>       Please state your preference for one of the following default 
> options :
> 
> A. Prefer public addresses over privacy addresses
> 
> B. Prefer privacy addresses over public addresses

B.

While I realise that the Argument From Personal Ignorance is not very
convincing, I am having a very hard time imagining why anyone would turn
on privacy addresses, then prefer non-privacy addresses...

Regards, K.

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Karl Auer (kauer@biplane.com.au)
http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer

GPG fingerprint: AE1D 4868 6420 AD9A A698 5251 1699 7B78 4EEE 6017
Old fingerprint: DA41 51B1 1481 16E1 F7E2 B2E9 3007 14ED 5736 F687

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email