RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt

Giuseppe Fioccola <> Thu, 22 July 2021 14:08 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F783A47CA; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.199
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.199 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IVMA0l1VLdzk; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:08:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B72743A47BC; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 07:08:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GVvFd0yGYz6DHMf; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 21:59:17 +0800 (CST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:08:12 +0200
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 15.01.2176.012; Thu, 22 Jul 2021 16:08:12 +0200
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <>
To: Erik Kline <>
CC: Stewart Bryant <>, Christopher Wood <>, Yoshifumi Nishida <>, "" <>, "" <>
Subject: RE: FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt
Thread-Topic: FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt
Thread-Index: AQHXZ5JcPVStVCzBRkCeukM7N9Fpb6sgVf3wgC2kVoCAATs+8A==
Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:08:12 +0000
Message-ID: <>
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_ea7246fe81b140fba42e6d202c2afc8bhuaweicom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2021 14:08:23 -0000

Hi Erik,
Thanks for the input.
I tend to agree that the condition “MUST” can be changed to “SHOULD”. I can address your comments in the -08 version.



From: Erik Kline <>
Sent: Wednesday, July 21, 2021 11:15 PM
To: Giuseppe Fioccola <>
Cc: Stewart Bryant <>; Christopher Wood <>; Yoshifumi Nishida <>;;
Subject: Re: FW: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt


I think in S2.1 "MUST NOT" be used outside a "controlled domain" is perhaps a bit too strong.  Similarly in S6, "MUST be applied in...controlled domains" might be moderated down to "SHOULD only be applied...".

I'll note that it is possible for an AH option to be used to ensure the DstOpt variant is unmodified en route, and these two in conjunction can be used wherever desired to send such packets outside the given domain (subject, of course, to all the middlebox interference any such packet would inevitably receive -- but that's a separate issue).

On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 11:27 AM Giuseppe Fioccola <<>> wrote:
Dear Stewart, Christopher, Yoshi, All,
Please note that I just submitted a new version of the draft. It has been thoroughly reviewed to address the comments received during the Last Call.

Your inputs are always welcome.



-----Original Message-----
From: ipv6 <<>> On Behalf Of<>
Sent: Tuesday, June 22, 2021 8:13 PM
Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance WG of the IETF.

        Title           : IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method
        Authors         : Giuseppe Fioccola
                          Tianran Zhou
                          Mauro Cociglio
                          Fengwei Qin
                          Ran Pang
        Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-07.txt
        Pages           : 21
        Date            : 2021-06-22

   This document describes how the Alternate Marking Method can be used
   as a passive performance measurement tool in an IPv6 domain.  It
   defines a new Extension Header Option to encode Alternate Marking
   information in both the Hop-by-Hop Options Header and Destination
   Options Header.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There is also an htmlized version available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

IETF IPv6 working group mailing list<>
Administrative Requests: