Re: [v6ops] RFC7084

Gert Doering <gert@space.net> Wed, 11 December 2013 19:34 UTC

Return-Path: <gert@Space.Net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7BF51AE1B2 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:34:02 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WfqdY_0-KkRT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:34:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (mobil.space.net [IPv6:2001:608:2:81::67]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 361DF1ADFB8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 11:33:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mobil.space.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701AC63AC1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:33:53 +0100 (CET)
X-SpaceNet-Relay: true
Received: from moebius3.space.net (moebius3.Space.Net [IPv6:2001:608:2:2::250]) by mobil.space.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 426BC63AAB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:33:53 +0100 (CET)
Received: (qmail 74143 invoked by uid 1007); 11 Dec 2013 20:33:53 +0100
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 20:33:53 +0100
From: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] RFC7084
Message-ID: <20131211193353.GQ81676@Space.Net>
References: <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DC7BB@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <2D09D61DDFA73D4C884805CC7865E611303B0269@GAALPA1MSGUSR9L.ITServices.sbc.com> <96747494E3D74D41B20907035DB1E48DCD72@MOPESMBX03.eu.thmulti.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1312100803370.24602@uplift.swm.pp.se> <F92E1B55-C74B-400C-B83E-6B50D175D121@steffann.nl> <7B4820C5-B562-4BE7-8C6A-CBCDABC39728@nominum.com> <A583EFC3-71BB-4962-875C-4AB775D13491@delong.com> <46BE373C-D476-4D83-B014-56B77FD3D67E@nominum.com> <39280481-09C5-41ED-B79E-99DBBD329F44@employees.org> <52A8343C.3040202@gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <52A8343C.3040202@gmail.com>
X-NCC-RegID: de.space
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
X-Spmfilter-Virus-Scanned: OK
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Ted Lemon <Ted.Lemon@nominum.com>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 19:34:02 -0000

Hi,

On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 10:45:32AM +0100, Alexandru Petrescu wrote:
> Am I the only to read this as maybe a hint towards necessity of creation
> of a new flag akin to M/O but specific to IA_PD? I.e. it would be allow
> a Router to see whether it may be able to specifically request a
> Delegated Prefix even when it would self-configure its address by other
> means than DHCP.

Yes.  A CPE does IA_PD, always, unless manually configured otherwise.

No need for a flag here.

Gert Doering
        -- NetMaster
-- 
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?

SpaceNet AG                        Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14          Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen                   HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444           USt-IdNr.: DE813185279