ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lifetime (Re: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00.txt)
Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> Wed, 05 May 2021 07:44 UTC
Return-Path: <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 449A03A1610 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:44:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, FROM_LOCAL_NOVOWEL=0.5, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM=0.001, HK_RANDOM_FROM=0.999, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxjl3_HyUxPx for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96A7E3A160C for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 May 2021 00:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id e2so990106ilr.1 for <6man@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 May 2021 00:44:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=C6OCZ+ebY6PQJPp/DlbjRgRGd01XedQ8SGCyKobDgpQ=; b=SQj8iVRF8dQUdY2g7zrVrsglhrGtzVxZ2gBwKfIm1/wVnPtcMlLqW7Jv3AU6rtQRO7 KqpkXm26bQhaXQE+pIOFbQUbKGskvfN46YavRe4RsH4BrP0wvKx9TmB6wRrIBbQWMszo ofbIropWC2VDezpbR0Wsoyw3fhHvxVKUSLA0oAxYgTCjGt2BrOfyZwhF/uOC99NEWxJs J9qcH+wpTQJ9GrM2S8cqRjpdtSyDypr5A4KsoBGLKeCqPdzqhJ0IcqQQTz05WCk6jvYl QIdF8FCSx0TV5e3dVfeVZYJSEchyL4haL633JskVcQmt6IIgf82ndZhNU9OpyjV/1hen fzcg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=C6OCZ+ebY6PQJPp/DlbjRgRGd01XedQ8SGCyKobDgpQ=; b=WVtelMeON3eJFoEDjppDdydp6rGYo0idY3gIOwbc8wiSp9qTA6h0TPMDYjOsrLVLQY l08QMEm132HUylbM2YFAi6gDVBNNAWB1g2Q2gz5YtvM40X3w08hXRRwkaq/VzXHYHRRd qfLLdHq97vERKWd9uQqMQDpe0AmbjW0YDVWGA7cvkkHj0d+YIwrL2UV6dLjBtzm/Bvd5 PBg7wIgok2BvyhnAVP6kX6Wk/l6YKEUud+Bz5xqc6oXn7MIcwlk92VFyWb4XbJECbFep 7Ff6tzUwSjo9KSOOrdNuKeVNA2FkqxcUbO+/psQB4A1OtTRzRAPZfSNxWB1+UMnnBS37 ol+A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532uoqCNIkNDnr6qMS241yveahno7ifmL6O4VcTaoVqjVIUoyr3j dXt00AMscFtulPuIkfUKDHhPfb6epjTa7IPQGRn9WHkP
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwDVeKQqpvFD/o5GyVDSMKtq8MfxKc7d92JdfZchrV6nsAiuIb852S5c/WKr+aQXLowfa6b+2M5creGzVJkjeQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:d488:: with SMTP id p8mr24361652ilg.149.1620200646000; Wed, 05 May 2021 00:44:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <162011606497.27748.2372985755866817594@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAO42Z2xWLnEe8L4Zy3jXZcecGMGV45eyKfpFtKprOD2AdQ+LWA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAO42Z2xWLnEe8L4Zy3jXZcecGMGV45eyKfpFtKprOD2AdQ+LWA@mail.gmail.com>
From: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 17:43:39 +1000
Message-ID: <CAO42Z2zioVfudbB0_b9Ous4gUaE4ASU8RAp83s4mGQXX2oV+Fg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lifetime (Re: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00.txt)
To: 6MAN <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/P-NgmOhtPjjvHn8DvFdROPvpV7c>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2021 07:44:09 -0000
Now with a more exciting email subject! On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 18:24, Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi All, > > I've been thinking for a while that the Router Lifetime field name > wasn't as accurate and expressive as it could be, and then we had > somebody asking fairly recently on the mailing list about how Router > Lifetime and ND lifetime (IIRC) values interacted on the mailing list. > > So an ID proposing to rename the field to Default Router Lifetime, and > also providing an example scenario of when a zero value Default Router > Lifetime would be used to demonstrate that a zero value RA is valid > and useful in some scenarios. > > Comments and suggestions most welcome. > > Thanks very much, > Mark. > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message --------- > From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 at 18:14 > Subject: New Version Notification for > draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00.txt > To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com> > > > > A new version of I-D, draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00.txt > has been successfully submitted by Mark Smith and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime > Revision: 00 > Title: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lifetime > Document date: 2021-05-04 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 4 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime/ > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-smith-6man-accurate-ra-router-lifetime-00 > > > Abstract: > IPv6 Router Advertisements (RAs) have a "Router Lifetime" field, > which specifies how long the advertising router will act as a default > router for the receiving hosts, unless refreshed with another > advertisement. The field name "Router Lifetime" is quite general, > and could easily be misunderstood to mean the bounded lifetime of all > of the information contained in the RA. This memo more accurately > renames this field "Default Router Lifetime". > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > > The IETF Secretariat
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-smith-6ma… Mark Smith
- ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lifetim… Mark Smith
- Re: ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lif… Alexandre Petrescu
- RE: ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lif… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: ID: More Accurately Naming IPv6 RA Router Lif… tom petch