IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 09 July 2012 19:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868DA11E8215 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.089, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U1VnKAZy9ucc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:47:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-f44.google.com (mail-yw0-f44.google.com [209.85.213.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08A1811E8214 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:47:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yhq56 with SMTP id 56so13084925yhq.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=64DmnrJZaBZyU4HucuHyIaJB/1ZSd2x39XidrDX+HnE=; b=KoKJgt8UF5daHRdKQ10nHzcM6N75uV33KwEL/ctzYPlrM5oa9NSU+zFSXdq53ahrwr 16f5JxFfkf0820Op0XuzXDVnArby6Q2qbaStJsSrYYss58vowykLSmvDN3VN8FfrOasN x0r/7XINS48+S6GIswPfnQgqnh9UtBd/jkBxTLzqcoDaZjxM54ulRlve/xJaoWXXlwP5 ns6GLlauFcGPEpvg/qjtVGpNTPuehW9uZQrwlaj5qyfCthYjZY57Ep1d+ZetzdecAi6u CaTKZtwgDkdJNkd9sZ1aOeq5yJUfvN5CJUM1KZ+grqeRBV6hZ8L76IhmbLF6TZ77KZQW OgxQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.160.198 with SMTP id xm6mr9597700igb.0.1341863297081; Mon, 09 Jul 2012 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.231.118.210 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jul 2012 12:48:17 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4FFB27CA.5070002@viagenie.ca>
References: <4FF696AA.3050508@tut.fi> <23986.1341586765@marajade.sandelman.ca> <CAC8QAcfCw=ECvTGFGMabScFA+CQkw4_wTAfYg=5r=UQ4PBKcHQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAD6AjGTQf-VWawsDJWy4NTHePqWuw5LT39hrZ1E8XDzkHEVVGg@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAcd_DpUryqV8axbErFGKy6Zb9WRKKn4ADNqdGpSO7-+GCA@mail.gmail.com> <4FFB27CA.5070002@viagenie.ca>
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 14:48:17 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAcez2PQbAmX8OPPEv7hy1ZBbYLQS-6Sn1zo96P7Gd0X04g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-chen-v6ops-nat64-experience-02
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
To: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2012 19:47:52 -0000

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Simon Perreault
<simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> wrote:
> On 2012-07-09 14:41, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 12:38 PM, Cameron Byrne<cb.list6@gmail.com>  wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Behcet Sarikaya<sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It seems like this is what is called stateless NAT64.
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if there is any document specifying stateless NAT64?
>>>
>>>
>>> Stateless = http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6145
>>
>>
>> Are you sure?
>>
>> Here is a quote from 6146:
>> Stateful NAT64 is a mechanism for translating IPv6 packets to IPv4
>>     packets and vice versa.  The translation is done by translating the
>>     packet headers according to the IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm defined
>>     in [RFC6145].
>
>
> Cameron is right. RFC6145 is often referred to as "stateless NAT64".
>
That means stateless NAT64 is not defined maybe it is a myth.

Regards,

Behcet

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email